Pilot Forced to Surrender His Cessna 206 Over a Six Pack | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Wed, Apr 30, 2025

Pilot Forced to Surrender His Cessna 206 Over a Six Pack

Alaskan Man Seeks a Supreme Court Opinion in Decade-Old Case

Fairbanks pilot Kenneth Jouppi is being forced to forfeit his Cessna 206 Stationair after ‘knowingly’ using it to transport a six-pack to a dry village… 13 years ago. The case has been through the weeds since then and may now be on its way to the Supreme Court.

Jouppi’s case first began with a ruling from a Fairbanks jury over a decade ago. He, as the owner of KenAir LLC, was found guilty of a misdemeanor bootlegging charge after he assisted a passenger loading their cargo into the aircraft. These boxes and bags contained around 72 bottles of beer, however, and Alaska State Troopers were standing just off to the side with a warrant.

Though the court was unable to determine whether or not Jouppi was aware of what was inside the boxes, they were able to prove that he knew at least one six-pack was on board since it was visible through a plastic bag. Jouppi was slapped with three days in jail, a $1,500 fine for both him and KenAir, and three years of probation.

At the time, Jouppi’s Cessna 206 was still safe. District court trial judge Patrick Hammers clarified that the state’s law did not allow it to confiscate the aircraft. The Alaska Court of Appeals was quick to fight this decision, reversing the earlier court ruling and sending it back to the trial judge.

After several more court dates, a petition made its way to the Alaska Supreme Court to decide whether a $95,000 value forfeiture was excessive under constitutional law. Judges found that, "within this context, it is clear that the illegal importation of even a six-pack of beer causes grave societal harm. This factor strongly suggests that the forfeiture is not grossly disproportional."

So, after 13 years of court confusion, Alaska may still be able to take away Jouppi’s bird.

"In my opinion, if this isn't an excessive fine, I don't know what is," noted Robert John, Jouppi's attorney. "The odds are good that we're gonna be seeking review in the United States Supreme Court. So we gotta muster our resources and proceed forward."

FMI: https://courts.alaska.gov

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Douglas A-4K

Pilot Applied Full Aft Stick And Nose-Up Trim, But The Airplane Remained On The Runway Analysis: The pilot reported that a preflight inspection and flight control checks revealed n>[...]

ANN FAQ: Q&A 101

A Few Questions AND Answers To Help You Get MORE Out of ANN! 1) I forgot my password. How do I find it? 1) Easy... click here and give us your e-mail address--we'll send it to you >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: PBY Catalina--From Wartime to Double Sunrise to the Long Sunset

From 2022 (YouTube Edition): Before They’re All Gone... Humankind has been messing about in airplanes for almost 120-years. In that time, thousands of aircraft representing i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.01.25): Advanced Air Mobility (AAM)

Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) A transportation system that transports people and property by air between two points in the NAS using aircraft with advanced technologies, including el>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.01.25)

Aero Linx: MQ-1B Predator The MQ-1B Predator is an armed, multi-mission, medium-altitude, long-endurance remotely piloted aircraft that is employed primarily as an intelligence-col>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC