Legal Proceedings Against Heathrow Expansion Begin | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Fri, Oct 05, 2018

Legal Proceedings Against Heathrow Expansion Begin

Coalition Of Anti-Heathrow Expansion Groups Welcome ‘Decisive Action’

Plans for Heathrow expansion met their first legal test on Thursday as claimants against the proposals seek to proceed their cases to full judicial review.

Five parties have lodged judicial review claims against the plans. The claims are against the Government’s National Policy Statement – which only included Heathrow expansion – which Parliament voted on in June 2018, despite many unanswered questions about the projects legality and wider environmental impact.

The five parties seeking judicial review include: A consortium of local authorities (Hillingdon, Hammersmith & Fulham, Richmond, Wandsworth and Windsor &  Maidenhead), Greenpeace and the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan. Heathrow Hub Limited (promoters of a rival scheme to expand Heathrow Friends of the Earth Plan B, an environmental justice organization Neil Spurrier – a resident of Twickenham, Middlesex.

The No 3rd Runway Coalition, whose membership comprises a number of claimants, welcomed the process and warned that the process was now underway, with the chance to highlight the severe negative impacts the project would have.

"The legal actions against the government's decision to expand Heathrow is supported by a very large number of communities, who firmly believe that the negative environmental impact of this highly disruptive airport should not be allowed to grow," said Paul McGuinness, Chair of the No 3rd Runway Coalition. “Having ignored evidence, such as the report of Parliament's Transport Select Committee, the decision to expand Heathrow was always going to end up in the courts, under judicial review, and we are delighted that the process has now started and welcome this decisive action by a number of parties.”

It is envisaged that the issues raised by the claimants (relating primarily to environmental impacts, and the ignoring or withholding of evidence in the decision-making process) will be heard in March 2019.

(Source: No 3rd Runway Coalition news release. Image from file)

FMI: www.no3rdrunwaycoalition.co.uk

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Capella Aircraft Corp FW1C50

Pilot Reported That He Was Unfamiliar With The Single Seat Amateur-Built Airplane And His Intent Was To Perform High-Speed Taxi Testing Analysis: The pilot reported that he was unf>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Timber Tiger Touts Curtiss Jenny Replicas

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): First Kits to Ship October 2023 Having formerly resurrected the storied shape of the Ryan ST—in effigy, anyway—Montrose, Colorado-based Tim>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.04.25): Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO]

Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO] Area navigation based on performance requirements for aircraft operating along an ATS route, on an instrument approach procedure or in a d>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC