Lawmakers Seek to Facilitate N.J. Airport Improvements | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Sun, Jun 19, 2022

Lawmakers Seek to Facilitate N.J. Airport Improvements

Patience is a Virtue—Unless You’re Spending D.O.T. Money

In an effort to prioritize progress over bureaucratic malfeisence, New Jersey lawmakers have advanced legislation that would afford airports additional time to apply state funds to much-needed improvements.

Currently, airports are obligated to utilize Department of Transportation grants within two years of receiving them. In most cases, however, the interval expires before airport improvement projects are granted requisite local approval or finalize engineering work—especially if community opposition slows the process.

Complications and delays notwithstanding, the DOT grants expire after two years.

“I have personal experience in how long it takes to get local municipal approval,” said Suzanne Nagle, co-owner of Solberg Airport in Hunterdon County, NJ.

“It costs tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees, plus other experts that are not covered under the grant. It’s a very tedious process, and limiting it to two years pretty much negates the grant. It’s almost impossible to do it in two years.”

The Department of Transportation allocates approximately $4-million a year to New Jersey’s forty public-use airports and one seaplane base. The sum is woefully short of the $20-million annual investment Garden State airports require to improve safety. It’s also significantly lower than the $466 million in airport improvements New Jersey airports will need over the next two decades—according to a recent study.

Peter Weidhorn, owner of Eagle’s Nest Airport in Ocean County, NJ, asserts, “The New Jersey airport system is in critical need of significant infrastructure, redevelopment, and obstruction elimination to ensure the continued economic growth that benefits the state through tax dollars, high-value employment opportunities, and industry that relies on air transportation to move personnel and freight,” Weidhorn added, “Runways, like highways, wear out, and it costs millions to resurface the runway. Private airport owners, counties, or townships don’t have the funds to maintain safe infrastructure.”

Aviation advocates have urged lawmakers to designate the state Department of Transportation the sole authority authorized to approve airport safety improvements—thereby precluding self-serving objections by municipalities, real-estate developers, and local property owners.

“Local objections certainly should be taken into consideration and dealt with accordingly,” states William Leavens, a pilot and board vice president of the Mid-Atlantic Aviation Coalition, “but personal objections by a small and vocal group of people should not be veto power over investments in public safety.”

FMI: https://njleg.state.nj.us

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.29.25)

Aero Linx: Transport Canada We are a federal institution, leading the Transport Canada portfolio and working with our partners. Transport Canada is responsible for transportation p>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.29.25): Gross Navigation Error (GNE)

Gross Navigation Error (GNE) A lateral deviation from a cleared track, normally in excess of 25 Nautical Miles (NM). More stringent standards (for example, 10NM in some parts of th>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Anticipating Futurespace - Blue Origin Visits Airventure 2017

From AirVenture 2017 (YouTube Edition): Flight-Proven Booster On Display At AirVenture… EAA AirVenture Oshkosh is known primarily as a celebration of experimental and amateu>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus SR22

Aircraft Parachute System (CAPS) Was Deployed About 293 Ft Above Ground Level, Which Was Too Low To Allow For Full Deployment Of The Parachute System Analysis: The day before the a>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.26.25: PA18 Upgrades, ‘Delta Force’, Rhinebeck

Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC