Increasing UAV Popularity Raises The Question: Who Owns Your Airspace | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.09.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.10.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.11.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.12.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.06.25

Mon, May 18, 2015

Increasing UAV Popularity Raises The Question: Who Owns Your Airspace

At Least 17 States Have Passed Laws Restricting UAV Flights

With more and more people buying UAVs, and more of them being equipped with some kind of camera, communities nationwide are racing to catch up with the technology in terms of laws and regulations for their use ... or to prevent that use.

At least 17 states have passed laws regulating the use of UAVs, and users say that many of them are unnecessarily heavy-handed, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal. Laws came as people flew UAVs, often costing under $100, over homes, populated areas, and crime scenes. And Richard Beary, president of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, says that many departments are not equipped to regulate airspace.

The FAA says it has jurisdiction over airspace all the way to the ground, and that its rules will take precedence over any state or local law or regulation. But while it has been somewhat effective in regulating commercial use of the UAVs, it is largely prohibited from regulating non-commercial uses by a law passed in 2012. Still, that has not stopped some states from passing very restrictive laws about the use of UAVs, and some towns have banned them altogether.

The FAA says that, as long as non-commercial UAVs don't endanger people, they can hover over private property legally. However, the FAA says that local "noise and nuisance" laws could be used to regulate flight in some areas.

Privacy is another issue, and some state laws have banned the capture of still images or video with UAVs on private property without the express consent of the property owner.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.11.25)

Aero Linx: Florida Antique Biplane Association "Biplanes.....outrageous fun since 1903." That quote really defines what the Florida Antique Biplane Association (FABA) is all about.>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.05.25: New RV15 Wing, Scalebirds, Waiex-B Honors

Also: AV-30-C Software Upgrade, Paraglider Extremes, EarthX STC for Pitts, Vintage Aircraft Association Not only have the folks at Van’s Aircraft designed a new wing for the >[...]

Airborne-NextGen 06.10.25: Trump v Drones, Walmart-Wing, VoltAero HPU 210

Also: Skyryse Update, Ukraine Drone Attack, FAA Admin Vote, Starlink Interference Issues President Trump has signed a series of executive orders that claim to strengthen domestic d>[...]

Airborne 06.09.25: NTSB Lawsuit, Sensenich 100K, Possible DJI Ban???

Also: Snowbirds Ready!, NATA Wants Bedford, ATC Infrastructure Investment, Russia Refutes Drone Damage Alvin Brown, former Jacksonville mayor, is suing President Donald Trump after>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.12.25: Sonex High-Wing, Stunning 'RV916', VoltAero

Also: Women’s Air Race Classic, Sensenich 100K, ‘Premature’ GAMI G100UL Motion, Quicksilver Ultralights Sonex Aircraft announced that its high-wing prototype airc>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC