Settlement Reported Near In 2010 Palo Alto Crash | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.19.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.21.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.23.25

Wed, Jan 04, 2012

Settlement Reported Near In 2010 Palo Alto Crash

Pilot Departed In Fog, Result Was Damaged Homes, Three Fatalities

On February 17, 2010, a Cessna 310 (similar aircraft pictured) carrying three employees of Tesla Motors struck an electrical transmission tower shortly after takeoff from Palo Alto Airport in California. The wreckage skidded down a residential street, and while there were no injuries reported on the ground, debris struck several homes, setting three on fire.

Now, the San Jose Mercury News reports that an attorney for 51-year-old Lisa Jones, whose home was hit by a severed wing from the plane, has reached a financial settlement with Tesla Motors, the estate of the pilot, and several insurance companies. The home, which also housed a daycare center operated by Jones, suffered an estimated $200,000 damage, and has been uninhabitable for almost two years since the accident.

Jones first heard of the pending settlement announcement from a reporter. She tells the Mercury News, "I'm speechless. I feel there's something that's finally been done on my behalf."

The pilot of the Cessna 310, 56-year-old David Bourn, was a senior electrical engineer at Tesla Motors. Investigators say fog was so thick at the time of the takeoff that Bourn was warned by a controller who could not see his own runway. About 30 seconds after the initial warning, the controller repeated, "I cannot clear you for takeoff because I don't have visibility on the runway, so the release is all yours, and it's at your own risk, sir."

The NTSB's final report, published November 22, 2011, found pilot error the cause of the accident, but the board's report would not have been admissible in a civil liability trial. The terms of the forthcoming settlement have not been revealed.

FMI: http://dms.ntsb.gov/aviation/AccidentReports/uednk1551xxkpy45kkmpdh551/Y01032012120000.pdf

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: Lee Aviation LLC JA30 SuperStol

A Puff Of Smoke Came Out From The Top Of The Engine Cowling Followed By A Total Loss Of Engine Power On May 9, 2025, about 1020 mountain daylight time, an experimental amateur-buil>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Curtiss Jenny Build Wows AirVenture Crowds

From 2022 (YouTube Edition): Jenny, I’ve Got Your Number... Among the magnificent antique aircraft on display at EAA’s AirVenture 2022 was a 1918 Curtiss Jenny painstak>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.25): Very High Frequency (VHF)

Very High Frequency (VHF) The frequency band between 30 and 300 MHz. Portions of this band, 108 to 118 MHz, are used for certain NAVAIDs; 118 to 136 MHz are used for civil air/grou>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.30.25)

“From approximately November 2021 through January 2022, Britton-Harr, acting on behalf of AeroVanti, entered into lease-purchase agreements for five Piaggio-manufactured airc>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Quest Kodiak Enhances Migration Monitoring Programs

From 2008 (YouTube Edition): US Fish and Wildlife Service Chooses The Kodiak To Monitor Waterfowl Populations Waterfowl all over North America may soon have to get used to a new ab>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC