Tamarack Denies NTSB Blame | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.09.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.10.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Sun, Nov 07, 2021

Tamarack Denies NTSB Blame

Says 2018 Citation Crash Report Self-Contradictory

Tamarack has disputed the findings of probable cause in the NTSB’s final report of a 2018 crash of Cessna Citation N525EG.

The Board faulted Tamarack’s Active Winglet system, alleging that the crash was the result of an “asymmetric deployment of the leftwing load alleviation system for undetermined reasons.” Tamarack states that forensic evidence collected in the course of the investigation proved that the load alleviation was indeed functioning correctly and deploying symmetrically upon impact. Additionally, the company points out a number of inconsistencies and omissions in the official report. 

First, they note that the NTSB’s final report states the aircraft was rolling at 5 degrees per second, when the autopilot automatically disconnected at 30 degrees of bank, not, as a functioning Citation autopilot would, at 45 degrees of bank or 10 degrees per second. They note the failure of the investigation to account for the premature autopilot disconnect and inappropriate automated response for an excessive bank condition. 

Tamarack notes their full cooperation throughout the investigation, but says the NTSB published a revised Factual Report, then the Final Report, without taking into consideration alternative causes.

Their supplemental data paints a picture of target fixation on the part of the agency, as if the concept of an active aerodynamics system was so clearly the cause of the crash that it precluded serious effort into any other avenue. They recall that the Final Report includes information that the pilot was able to carry out some corrective action late in the flight at very high speeds, but fail to make mention that, if there were an active winglet failure, then the aircraft would have been easier to recover at slower speeds. They point to this as a possible lead in understanding the true source of the incident. 

They note with sadness the casualties of the accident, and wish to ascertain everything possible that they may prevent future loss of another member of their Citation family. 

FMI www.tamarackaero.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.10.25): Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO]

Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO] Area navigation based on performance requirements for aircraft operating along an ATS route, on an instrument approach procedure or in a d>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cessna 172

The Airplane Came To Rest Underneath A Set Of Damaged Power Distribution Lines On The Floor Of A Coulee On June 19, 2025, at 1412 mountain daylight time, a Cessna 172K airplane, N7>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.10.25)

Aero Linx: FAA Managers Association (FAAMA) Recognized by the FAA, FAAMA is a professional association dedicated to the promotion of excellence in public service. The Association i>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Big Business of Diminutive Powerplants

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Jet Central Micro-Turbine Engines Impress Founded in the late-1990s, Mexico City-based Jet Central produces a unique and fascinating line of micro-turb>[...]

Airborne 07.11.25: New FAA Bos, New NASA Boss (Kinda), WB57s Over TX

Also: ANOTHER Illegal Drone, KidVenture Educational Activities, Record Launches, TSA v Shoes The Senate confirmed Bryan Bedford to become the next Administrator of the FAA, in a ne>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC