Suspicious? UAV Company Fined By The FAA Involved In Lawsuit Against The Agency | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.21.25

Airborne-Unlimited-07.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.23.25

Airborne-Unlimited-07.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.25.25

Thu, Oct 08, 2015

Suspicious? UAV Company Fined By The FAA Involved In Lawsuit Against The Agency

SkyPan International Fined $1.9 Million For Alleged 'Unauthorized Operations'

Tuesday, the FAA announced that it was proposing a $1.9 million fine against Chicago-based UAV photography company SkyPan International. It was the largest fine ever imposed against a UAV operator ... by $1,890,000.

SkyPan is one of several companies that is involved in a lawsuit against the FAA that hold that the agency can't make UAV operations illegal in the absence of formal small UAV regulations. The FAA's Congressionally-mandated deadline for such regulations came and went on September 30th.

The website motherboard.vice.com reports that SkyPan has been engaged in aerial photography for 27 years using both manned and now unmanned aircraft. It currently holds a Section 333 exemption for commercial UAV operation granted in April of this year.

But the FAA alleges that prior to obtaining the Section 333 exemption, Skypan flew at least 65 "unauthorized operations in some of our most congested airspace and heavily populated cities, violating airspace regulations and various operating rules. These operations were illegal and not without risk." Many were said to be violations of Class B airspace in New York and Chicago.

The FAA does not list specific instances of alleged violations in its letter to SkyPan, but does appear to have such detailed information.

SkyPan told motherboard.vice.com that it was still digesting the FAA's letter, and could not comment.

(Image from file)

FMI: http://skypanintl.com, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

OSH25 Day 5 Redux: Avidyne Vantage 12, Is Fly-Inn An AeroBnB?, B25 Miss Mitchell

Also: Pratt & Whitney 747SP, Gratia Aero, Robinson/MagniX, Jack Pelton Part5 The Avidyne Vantage 12 is finally certified and will shortly be shipping out so that aging Cirrus a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.29.25)

Aero Linx: Army Aviation Medicine Association (AAVMA) The Society of US Army Flight Surgeons (SoUSAFS) serves to advance the science and art of Aerospace Medicine and its allied sc>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Curtiss Wright P-40E

Witnesses Reported That They Heard A Loss Of Engine Power Analysis: Witnesses reported that the airplane departed from runway 35 after a successful runup. During the initial climb,>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.29.25): Radio Magnetic Indicator

Radio Magnetic Indicator An aircraft navigational instrument coupled with a gyro compass or similar compass that indicates the direction of a selected NAVAID and indicates bearing >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (07.29.25)

"After exiting, I had a vague recollection of what just happened…and a much clearer view of how quickly hypoxia can sneak up. Sign-ups for PROTE are open each day of AirVent>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC