'Drone Slayer' Case Dismissed By A Federal Judge | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date



Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday


Airborne On YouTube



Airborne-Unlimited-05.15.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.16.24


Tue, Apr 18, 2017

'Drone Slayer' Case Dismissed By A Federal Judge

Kentucky Gunslinger Will Not Be Required To Pay For Aircraft He Proudly Shot Down

A Kentucky man who proudly acknowledges that he shot down a neighbor's drone in 2015 will not be required to pay for damages to the aircraft after the case was tossed out by a federal judge.

The drone pilot was John David Boggs. He was demanding that William Merideth repay him for destroying his $1,500 drone that was flying at an altitude of nearly 200 feet over Merideth's property in July of 2015. Merideth had been charged with criminal mischief and wanton endangerment, but those charges had been previously dismissed, according to a report from television station WDRB. 

Merideth continued to claim that the aircraft was hovering low over his property. He said that it Boggs had kept flying, he would have left the drone alone. But once it hovered, he felt he had the right to shoot it down. Merideth said that he didn't know if whoever was flying the drone was trying to look at his daughters in their back yard, or what they were doing.

Boggs says he was simply practicing flying the drone, which he had bought just a few days prior to the incident, in anticipation of shooting video of his kids riding motocross. He has held firm to his claim that he did not fly low over Merideth's property, or hover.

The video from the aircraft seems to corroborate Boggs' story that the aircraft did not fly within 10 feet of the ground over Merideth's property. It does hover for about 30 seconds, but it was at an altitude over 200 feet at the time.

On March 21, Federal Judge Thomas B. Russell, the Senior Judge of the United States District Court, dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice saying the court did not have jurisdiction in the matter. Dismissing the suit "with prejudice" means that it cannot be refiled.

Merideth is unrepentant. In a cover photo on his Facebook page, he says "NOT ONLY DID I DO IT. BUT I MEANT TO DO IT. AND I'D DO IT AGAIN ... WITH A SMILE."

The profile picture on the Facebook page is captioned "THE DRONE SLAYER."

(Image from Facebook)

FMI: Full Article, https://www.facebook.com/william.merideth.7


More News

Samson Sky Hits the Wind Tunnel

Improvements Stack as Brand Readies for Mass Production Samson Sky updated followers on its flying car progress, describing some of the travails of the wind tunnel as they get clos>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.22.24): LAHSO

LAHSO An acronym for “Land and Hold Short Operation.” These operations include landing and holding short of an intersecting runway, a taxiway, a predetermined point, or>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.19.24)

Aero Linx: Space Medicine Association (SMA) The Space Medicine Branch was founded in 1951 as the first constituent organization of the Aerospace Medical Association (AsMA). In 2006>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.19.24): Back-Taxi

Back-Taxi A term used by air traffic controllers to taxi an aircraft on the runway opposite to the traffic flow. The aircraft may be instructed to back-taxi to the beginning of the>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus





© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC