Legal Wrangling Continues Between Longmont, CO And Mile-Hi Skydiving | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.24.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.18.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.19.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Apr 25, 2019

Legal Wrangling Continues Between Longmont, CO And Mile-Hi Skydiving

Judge Denies TRO Request Against The City, But Also Will Not Expedite A Hearing On Airport Rules

The long legal battle between Mile-Hi Skydiving and the City of Longmont, CO will not come to an early resolution, as the city had requested, but a judge has also refused to grant the skydiving company's request for a Temporary Restraining Order against the city.

The Times Call newspaper reports that Mile-Hi had requested the restraining order to prevent the city from implementing a new fee structure for renting land at the airport, and the installation of a surveillance system that would be used to assure that the company's clients land within the designated drop zone in paid-for public area.

The city had asked that Boulder District Judge Thomas Francis Mulvahill hear the case this month, but the hearing has been pushed back until May 31.

In its response to the city's motion to expedite, Mile-Hi had requested the temporary restraining order on the land use fees and video system. But Judge Mulvahill also denied the TRO, saying the company could not seek such relief in the response to the motion, which it had done. The judge also said Mile-Hi failed to establish that the company and its clients are being "irreparably harmed" by the city's actions.

 Mile-Hi continues to seek a preliminary injunction against the fee structure, under which the city charges just under 11 cents per square foot for the drop zone on an annual contract.

The judge also denied the city's request for an expedited hearing on a motion to dismiss the lawsuit on the grounds that the district court lacks jurisdiction in the case. The city argues that only the FAA can decide whether the complaint by Mile-Hi that the city's new airport policy is discriminatory has any merit.

The Longmont City Council met in a closed-door session Tuesday to discuss the case.

(Images from file)

FMI: Source report
Source report

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 11.24.25: ANN's 30th!, Starship’s V3 Booster Boom, Earhart Records

Also: 1st-Ever Space Crime Was a Fraud, IAE Buys Diamonds, Kennon Bows Out, Perseverance Rover An interesting moment came about this past Sunday as ANN CEO, Jim Campbell, noted tha>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: DeltaHawk Aero Engine Defies Convention

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Deviation from the Historical Mean Racine, Wisconsin-based DeltaHawk is a privately-held manufacturer of reciprocating engines for aircraft and hybrid >[...]

NTSB Final Report: Glasair GlaStar

Smoke Began Entering The Cockpit During The Landing Flare, And Then The Pilot Noticed Flames On The Right Side Of The Airplane Analysis: The pilot reported that about 30 minutes in>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.22.25): Remote Communications Outlet (RCO)

Remote Communications Outlet (RCO) An unmanned communications facility remotely controlled by air traffic personnel. RCOs serve FSSs. Remote Transmitter/Receivers (RTR) serve termi>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC