Illinois Appeals Court Puts Halt To O'Hare Expansion Plans | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.09.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.12.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Jan 12, 2009

Illinois Appeals Court Puts Halt To O'Hare Expansion Plans

Decision Puts $20 Billion OMP In Doubt

In a major setback for plans to expand Chicago O'Hare Airport, the Illinois appeals court on Thursday prevented the razing of the northeast part of the nearby Village of Bensenville.

As ANN reported, beginning in 2005 the City of Chicago forced some 500 families out of their homes in anticipation of the $20 billion O'Hare Modernization Program. The city wants to bulldoze the empty houses to clear the way for expanding the busy airport, but opponents to that plan -- including current Bensenville residents, who'd prefer not to have to move -- cite the potential for "severe consequences to public health" if those old homes are torn down.

Understandably, village President John Geils called the court decision a victory for residents of his community. "On top of commandeering our neighborhoods, the City of Chicago has been planning to risk the health and safety of Bensenville residents. The city's planned actions are reckless and deplorable, and the Illinois Court of Appeals is right to stop them."

Opponents to the expansion plan note work on the O'Hare expansion has not begun, and funding for the $20 billion project has not been secured. They also say FAA studies show that the expansion will not provide any significant improvement of airline delays at O'Hare; to the contrary, aviation experts say that OMP will instead produce massive delays and increase costs for both consumers and airlines during and after initial construction.

In addition, the airlines, including United Airlines and American Airlines, have called the OMP plan "ill-conceived" and "premature."

"The real story here is that OMP is nothing more than a $20 billion, taxpayer funded slush fund for politicians and their friends," says Geils. "The simple fact is that OMP is a runway to nowhere."

FMI: www.stop-omp.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.12.25)

Aero Linx: Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST) Founded in 1997, the Commercial Aviation Safety Team (USCAST) has developed an integrated, data-driven strategy to reduce the comm>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.12.25): Land And Hold Short Operations

Land And Hold Short Operations Operations that include simultaneous takeoffs and landings and/or simultaneous landings when a landing aircraft is able and is instructed by the cont>[...]

ANN FAQ: How Do I Become A News Spy?

We're Everywhere... Thanks To You! Even with the vast resources and incredibly far-reaching scope of the Aero-News Network, every now and then a story that should be reported on sl>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus Design Corp SF50

Pilot’s Inadvertent Use Of The Landing Gear Control Handle Instead Of The Flaps Selector Switch During The Landing Rollout Analysis: The pilot reported that during the landin>[...]

Airborne 12.08.25: Samaritan’s Purse Hijack, FAA Med Relief, China Rocket Fail

Also: Cosmonaut Kicked Out, Airbus Scales Back, AF Silver Star, Russian A-60 Clobbered A Samaritan’s Purse humanitarian flight was hijacked on Tuesday, December 2, while atte>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC