Feds Clarify Stance on Banning 100LL | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Sat, Jun 21, 2025

Feds Clarify Stance on Banning 100LL

FAA Confirms that No Other Avgas Meets the Criteria to Replace 100LL

In case there was any lingering ambiguity, the FAA has now made it crystal clear: federally funded airports cannot restrict access to 100-octane low-lead avgas (100LL). Unless, of course, they’d rather violate federal law and potentially pay $5,000 per day in penalties.

The clarification comes in the form of a Q&A released May 19, 2025, by the FAA’s Office of Airports. It interprets Section 770 of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024, which created Grant Assurance 40: a requirement that prohibits airports from banning or limiting the availability of 100LL until an FAA-approved, industry-accepted unleaded replacement fuel is both available and authorized for all aircraft.

And here’s the kicker—despite all the discussion, no such fuel currently exists. As of April 2025, the FAA confirms that none of the promising unleaded high-octane fuels on the market meet the legal criteria. Until that changes, 100LL remains the only game in town.

“For example, a fuel would have to be authorized for all aircraft and no fuel has been authorized for the rotorcraft fleet,” the statement read. “The FAA will provide additional information when the criteria is met.”

The Q&A also outlines what airports cannot do, including quietly revising rules, fees, or lease terms in ways that make it harder to access or sell 100LL. Even attempts to restrict self-fueling or impose local codes designed to discourage its use are off-limits. All of it counts as noncompliance under Grant Assurance 40.

The FAA says it will prioritize education and outreach, but reserves the right to conduct oversight and investigations. For those who don’t cooperate, civil penalties are on the table. And while the agency acknowledges the long-term goal of removing lead from avgas, it’s sticking with a methodical approach grounded in certification and safety instead of wishful thinking.

So for now, if your airport sold 100LL in 2022 and took federal dollars, your options are limited. Until an approved unleaded replacement exists, 100LL stays.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Rutan Long-EZ

He Attempted To Restart The Engine Three Times. On The Third Restart Attempt, He Noticed That Flames Were Coming Out From The Right Wing Near The Fuel Cap Analysis: The pilot repor>[...]

ANN FAQ: Turn On Post Notifications

Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: ICAS Perspectives - Advice for New Air Show Performers

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Leading Air Show Performers Give Their Best Advice for Newcomers On December 6th through December 9th, the Paris Las Vegas Hotel hosted over 1,500 air >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.28.25)

Aero Linx: NASA ASRS ASRS captures confidential reports, analyzes the resulting aviation safety data, and disseminates vital information to the aviation community. The ASRS is an i>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.28.25)

“For our inaugural Pylon Racing Seminar in Roswell, we were thrilled to certify 60 pilots across our six closed-course pylon race classes. Not only did this year’s PRS >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC