Governor's Plane Sparks Partisan Battle | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.17.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-FltTraining-11.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.14.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Aug 19, 2004

Governor's Plane Sparks Partisan Battle

New Mexico's Republicans Want A Delay, AG Agrees

Believe it or not, they're still fighting in New Mexico over the plane Governor Bill Richardson wants to buy.

As ANN reported back in June, the Democratic governor wants to buy a $4 million turboprop to replace the state's 1966 Aero-Commander. The proposal has done the bump and grind through the state's legislative process, only to end up at the center of partisan politics.

"It's a safety concern. It's a cost issue. It's something that needs to happen," said New Mexico Transportation Secretary Rhonda Faught. It's the same thing she's been saying for months. But now, Republicans in the legislature say the Richardson administration is pulling a classic bait-and-switch. It seems the Aero-Commander was fitted with a camera to monitor the progress of road construction. While the camera is being installed in another, older aircraft, Republicans are crying foul because the funds for replacing the plane are dedicated to roads.

Ironically, Attorney General Patricia Madrid -- a Democrat -- has ruled the money for a new aircraft should go "for the construction and maintenance of roads and bridges -- not to buy a passenger plane to fly government officials around."

But that's exactly what the state's RFP says: "The aircraft's primary mission will involve the transportation of government officials within, but not limited to, the State of New Mexico."

Madrid says that's downright illegal. Faught disagrees. If the two can't resolve their differences, the whole thing could end up in court.

FMI: www.nmshtd.state.nm.us

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.16.25): NonApproach Control Tower

NonApproach Control Tower Authorizes aircraft to land or takeoff at the airport controlled by the tower or to transit the Class D airspace. The primary function of a nonapproach co>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.16.25)

“This shutdown inflicted real damage. Beyond disrupting operations and adding risk into the aviation system… it hindered essential career growth opportunities and stal>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.16.25)

Aero Linx: The Mooney Mite Site Dedicated to the Mooney M-18 Mite, "The Most Personal Airplane," and to supporting Mite owners everywhere. The Mooney M-18 Mite is a single-place, l>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Vans Aircraft Inc RV-12

Pilot’s Improper Installation Of The Control Stick Pushrod Assemblies, Which Resulted In Separation Of The Left Pushrod And A Total Loss Of Roll Control Analysis: While retur>[...]

ANN FAQ: How Do I Become A News Spy?

We're Everywhere... Thanks To You! Even with the vast resources and incredibly far-reaching scope of the Aero-News Network, every now and then a story that should be reported on sl>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC