EAA Calls Out FAA for New Aircraft Testing Limitations | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.09.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Sep 16, 2024

EAA Calls Out FAA for New Aircraft Testing Limitations

New Policy Would Limit Airports Allowed For Phase I Tests

The EAA recently expressed its concern about a new FAA policy that would limit Phase I testing operations. The order, 8130.2K, was issued on August 28 and is expected to take effect on October 27.

Order 8130.2K cuts down on the number of airports permitted for Phase I flight testing. The previous wording stated: “This aircraft may only operate from [identify name of airport(s)],” to be filled in by the appropriate inspector or DAR. This enforced no specific cap on the number of airports that could be listed.

The new wording allows only one airfield to be listed, though “a second airfield may be listed with valid justification of a specific flight test or safety requirement.”

Phase I testing of an experimental aircraft requires ensuring it is able to operate in different environments. With only one field permitted for use, inspectors would not be able to verify an aircraft’s performance with various runway surfaces, wind conditions, or traffic volumes.

This order is not only needlessly restrictive, but also poses a potential safety hazard. Especially in initial testing, where the safety of a flight could be compromised at any given moment, pilots should not have to worry about getting the aircraft back to one specific location. Plus, if the listed field were to be temporarily shut down after takeoff, pilots would be inconvenienced with an extra workload just for needing to land the plane somewhere else.

For obvious reasons, the EAA is not happy with the new order.

“We want to be clear that we are aware of no enforcement action ever being undertaken by the FAA in a case such as this and encourage all pilots to exercise their authority under FAR 91.3, but this unnecessary limitation in available airports would add needless complication to an already stressful situation,” the organization published.

The EAA has brought its concerns to the FAA in hopes of getting the policy reversed and has since received “favorable indications” of reconsideration.

FMI: www.eaa.org, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.07.25)

“This vote sends an undeniable message to Air Transat management: We are unified, resolute, and have earned a contract that reflects today’s industry standards, not the>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.07.25)

Aero Linx: Beech Aero Club The Beech Aero Club (BAC) is the international type club for owners and pilots of the Beech Musketeer aircraft and its derivatives, the Sport, Super, Sun>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Lafferty Jack Sea Rey

While Landing In The River, The Extended Landing Gear Contacted The Water And The Airplane Nosed Over, Resulting In Substantial Damage Analysis: The pilot of the amphibious airplan>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The B29 SuperFortress ‘Doc’ - History in Flight

From 2022 (YouTube Edition): Carrying the Legacy of The B-29 For Generations to Come We had a chance to chat with the Executive Director of B-29 Doc, Josh Wells, during their stop >[...]

Airborne 12.08.25: Samaritan’s Purse Hijack, FAA Med Relief, China Rocket Fail

Also: Cosmonaut Kicked Out, Airbus Scales Back, AF Silver Star, Russian A-60 Clobbered A Samaritan’s Purse humanitarian flight was hijacked on Tuesday, December 2, while atte>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC