Disney Seeks Section 333 Exemption From The FAA | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Wed, Jan 20, 2016

Disney Seeks Section 333 Exemption From The FAA

Wants To Use 'Flixels' In Theme Parks For 'Entertainment Purposes'

Anyone who has flown in central Florida, particularly using any kind of glass panel, knows there is a permanent TFR in place over Walt Disney World just outside Orlando. But now the entertainment giant hopes to be able to fly UAVs within that TFR, and one over its California property, for its own purposes.

The company on October 30 filed for a Section 333 exemption to fly what it calls "Flixels" ... aircraft that are "based on traditional UAS [unmanned aircraft systems] platforms and include advanced control and positioning technology, onboard sensors (gyroscopes, accelerometers, GPS, barometers, magnetometers), and advanced wireless communication solutions."

The Orlando Sentinel reports that the company said in its application that it would not fly the aircraft over guest areas and not above 150 feet agl. The flights would take place mostly over water features in the park and in restricted areas. They would be used for park entertainment productions, including fireworks.

Disney even mentions the TFRs in its application. It said that the aircraft would "not interrupt national airspace activity because the Walt Disney World and Disneyland Resorts airspaces are registered no-fly zones."

Disney even blows its own horn a bit in the application. As a way to bolster its case, the company said that "in December 2012, Disney made several flights of an Imagineers-designed "fire breathing dragon," which was actually an elaborate glider and parachute obscured by the night sky, over The Magic Kingdom at Walt Disney World to celebrate the grand opening of Fantasyland."

Disney usually gets what it wants ... so it would not be a surprise to read that the exemption has been granted.

FMI: www.faa.gov/uas/legislative_programs/section_333

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Capella Aircraft Corp FW1C50

Pilot Reported That He Was Unfamiliar With The Single Seat Amateur-Built Airplane And His Intent Was To Perform High-Speed Taxi Testing Analysis: The pilot reported that he was unf>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Timber Tiger Touts Curtiss Jenny Replicas

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): First Kits to Ship October 2023 Having formerly resurrected the storied shape of the Ryan ST—in effigy, anyway—Montrose, Colorado-based Tim>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.04.25): Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO]

Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO] Area navigation based on performance requirements for aircraft operating along an ATS route, on an instrument approach procedure or in a d>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC