NASA IG Says Orion Review Board Violates Federal Laws | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.27.25

AirborneNextGen-
10.28.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.29.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.30.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Fri, May 02, 2008

NASA IG Says Orion Review Board Violates Federal Laws

Includes Employees Of Contractors Tasked With Building New Spacecraft

According to a report issued this week by NASA's Inspector General, the board established to review development and construction of the agency's upcoming Orion manned spacecraft includes six employees of companies tasked with building the capsule... a violation of both federal law, and common-sense ethics.

The board, chaired by former Skylab astronaut Ed Gibson, was established to scrutinize those very companies, reports The Associated Press. But Gibson and five other boardmembers work for NASA contractors building various components of the spacecraft.

Of the 19 members of the Orion review board, three are employed by Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC), which is tasked with building Orion test facilities. Two -- Gibson, and former NASA flight director Neil Hutchinson -- are vice presidents and stockholders.

Jack Garman, a former NASA employee and key figure with the Apollo lunar program, works for Lockheed Martin -- the prime builder of the Orion spacecraft. Two others work for contractors MEI Technologies, and Gray Research Inc.

The IG says that's a clear conflict of interest, and wants those six members suspended. But NASA replies it's not that easy, since engineers qualified to make informed decisions regarding a highly specialized spacecraft will, by definition, usually work for either the space agency, or one of its contractors.

NASA spokesman David Steitz adds this isn't the first time the agency has had to deal with such concerns... but that explanation doesn't sit well with New York University professor Paul Light, an expert on government ethics.

Light tells the AP the IG report indicates "a flagrant abuse and Congress should investigate... Not only is NASA ready to challenge the laws of physics, it appears more than willing to challenge the laws of Congress."

FMI: Read The IG's Report (.pdf)

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.31.25): Minimum Sector Altitude [ICAO]

Minimum Sector Altitude The lowest altitude which may be used under emergency conditions which will provide a minimum clearance of 300 m (1,000 feet) above all obstacles located in>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (10.31.25)

Aero Linx: African Civil Aviation Commission (AFCAC) At AFCAC, our Safety Strategic Objective is to enhance Aviation Safety and the efficiency of Air Navigation Services in Africa.>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Airbus A321-271N (A1); Cessna 172N (A2)

The Local Controller’s Poor Judgment In Prioritization Of Their Ground Traffic Ahead Of Their Airborne Traffic Analysis: Hawaiian Airlines flight 70 (HAL70), N2165HA, an Airb>[...]

ANN FAQ: Follow Us On Instagram!

Get The Latest in Aviation News NOW on Instagram Are you on Instagram yet? It's been around for a few years, quietly picking up traction mostly thanks to everybody's new obsession >[...]

Airborne 10.30.25: Earhart Search, SpaceX Speed Limit, Welcome Back, Xyla!

Also: Beech M-346N, Metro Gains H160 EMS STC, New Bell Boss, Affordable Flying Expo Tickets NOW On Sale! Purdue University’s Research Foundation and the Archaeological Legacy>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC