More Insurance May Become Mandatory For Hollister Airport Users | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Thu, Nov 06, 2003

More Insurance May Become Mandatory For Hollister Airport Users

Open Wallet Before Flight...

The aviation world never seems to be able to catch its breath before something else pops up to increase its cost. A new dilemma for flyers in the Hollister, CA, area is being discussed whereby the Airport may mandate additional forms of liability insurance before pilots may be allowed to use the facility.

According to city staffers, the matter will come under discussion over the next few months by both city as well as airport officials.

Why?

The answer comes from City Manager Dale Shaddox, “Anything that occurs, any injury or damage that occurs on city property, subjects the city to getting sued.”

Mind you, the city already has a number of insurance requirements in place. Those with hangar leases are required to carry some manner of liability insurance, though enforcement of this rule is allegedly spotty. That situation may soon end with a recent effort to review lease agreements and check for insurance coverage.  

The latest requirements, though, may soon extend to anyone who operates out of the aircraft, whether they lease a hangar or not. Initially; the insurance may be required for any pilot who is based at the airport, but may be extended to anyone who operates there, despite their base of operations.

Insurance Demands... From An Insurance Broker?

Councilman Tony Bruscia, who is, intriguingly enough, a full-time insurance broker, lashed out at so-called uninsured pilots, “Pilots who are uninsured, that’s incredibly irresponsible... If something happens, and they crash into a house and kill people or injure them, who’s going to pay for that?”

Bruscia also countered questions about the cost of these requirements with a statement that proclaimed, "If it’s a big deal (the cost of such insurance), then give up the plane because it’s a privilege - it’s not a right.”

Local media reports allow that there has never been a serious accident at the airport, and that local pilots are (surprise!) apparently unhappy with the additional restrictions that they may be facing.

FMI: http://hollister.ca.gov/site/index.asp

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Capella Aircraft Corp FW1C50

Pilot Reported That He Was Unfamiliar With The Single Seat Amateur-Built Airplane And His Intent Was To Perform High-Speed Taxi Testing Analysis: The pilot reported that he was unf>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Timber Tiger Touts Curtiss Jenny Replicas

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): First Kits to Ship October 2023 Having formerly resurrected the storied shape of the Ryan ST—in effigy, anyway—Montrose, Colorado-based Tim>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.04.25): Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO]

Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO] Area navigation based on performance requirements for aircraft operating along an ATS route, on an instrument approach procedure or in a d>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC