Georgia Couple Sues FAA Over October, 2014 Accident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.28.25

Airborne-NextGen-04.29.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.30.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Sat, Sep 02, 2017

Georgia Couple Sues FAA Over October, 2014 Accident

Says Air Traffic Controllers 'Misdirected' Pilot To An Airport Beyond Airplane's Glide Distance

A Georgia couple has sued the FAA, saying an air traffic controller directed them to an airport that was outside the glide distance of the TBM 850 they were aboard when it lost engine power in October 2014.

The TBM was being flown by S. Blaine McCaleb III with his wife Cynthia aboard. The plane lost power, and McCaleb declared an in-flight emergency. According to the complaint filed Friday in the U.S. District Court's Northern District of Georgia, the controller gave McCaleb vectors to an airport that was about 10 nautical miles away, rather than an airport that was only 1.7 nautical miles from their location. The plane went down onto an athletic field. Both people on board survived the accident, but were both seriously injured, according to the complaint.

The suit names the Department of Transportation and the FAA as defendants, saying the controller "failed to follow training directives and failed to use reasonable care during communications with the pilot.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution reports that the airports are not named in the suit. But the Fayette County Sheriff's office said at the time that the plane had departed DeKalb-Peachtree Airport en route to Harris County Airport in Pine Mountain. The flight was diverted to Atlanta Regional Airport-Falcon Field in Peachtree City before it went down in an unoccupied athletic field at Starr's Mill High School in Fayetteville, GA.

The couple is seeking unspecified damages from the Government.

The NTSB's probable cause report, which is not admissible as evidence in court, said the probable cause of the accident was the pilot’s inadvertent deactivation of the yaw damper in flight, which resulted in a prolonged side-slip condition that led to fuel starvation and the eventual total loss of engine power. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s failure to attempt to restart the engine.

(Image from file. Not accident Airplane)

FMI: Original Report, NTSB Probable Cause Report

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.30.25)

Aero Linx: Aviators Code Initiative (ACI) Innovative tools advancing aviation safety and offering a vision of excellence for aviators. The ACI materials are for use by aviation pra>[...]

ANN FAQ: Turn On Post Notifications

Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Agile Aero’s Jeff Greason--Disruptive Aerospace Innovations

From 2016 (YouTube Edition): Who You Gonna Call When You Have a Rocket Engine that Needs a Spacecraft? While at EAA AirVenture 2016, ANN CEO and Editor-In-Chief, Jim Campbell, sat >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.30.25)

"In my opinion, if this isn't an excessive fine, I don't know what is... The odds are good that we're gonna be seeking review in the United States Supreme Court. So we gotta muster>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.30.25): Expedite

Expedite Used by ATC when prompt compliance is required to avoid the development of an imminent situation. Expedite climb/descent normally indicates to a pilot that the approximate>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC