FAA Issues Airworthiness Directive for 777 Fuel Tanks | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Sat, Mar 04, 2023

FAA Issues Airworthiness Directive for 777 Fuel Tanks

Despite A Variety of Viewpoints, the FAA Charges Ahead on Revision 6

The FAA issued a final rule airworthiness directive regarding lighting protection on the Boeing 777, requiring all operators of the type to make changes to their fuel system in order to retain compliance.

The AD addresses "arcing inside the main and center fuel tanks in the event of a fault current or lightning strike" which could quickly ignite flammable fuel vapors inside to the complete loss of the aircraft. The fix will require Teflon sleeves in certain areas, in addition to cap sealing on fasteners, with detailed inspections of the affected areas added to procedures.

The AD was the subject of a heady amount of commentary among operators and industry groups, with some back and forth seen among international operators as they sought to nail down an agreeable fix. Overall, the FAA saw commentary from 7 operators, including American Airlines, Boeing, Emirates, Royal Dutch (KLM), Air France, FedEx, and United, in addition to pilot groups. American operators didn't seem to mind the NPRM too much, but Air France, KLM, United preferred the use of revision 7 as the mandate imposed by the final rule instead of Revision 6. Air France asserted that certain errors within Revision 6 were corrected with Boeing, with their fix published in Revision 7. 

KLM saw a different issue with the NPRM, saying that it contained "technical detail that should not be included in a high-level regulation such as an AD, and that it could possibly lead to confusion and mistakes by airline staff." One issue pointed to was the mention that "seven fasteners should be inspected and sealed", without specification as to exactly which of the numerous fasteners should receive the extra attention. 

Those issues are only a sample of the handful of comments made, with the final publication containing the details of each operator's commentary.

FMI: www.federalregister.gov

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Rutan Long-EZ

He Attempted To Restart The Engine Three Times. On The Third Restart Attempt, He Noticed That Flames Were Coming Out From The Right Wing Near The Fuel Cap Analysis: The pilot repor>[...]

ANN FAQ: Turn On Post Notifications

Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: ICAS Perspectives - Advice for New Air Show Performers

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Leading Air Show Performers Give Their Best Advice for Newcomers On December 6th through December 9th, the Paris Las Vegas Hotel hosted over 1,500 air >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.28.25)

Aero Linx: NASA ASRS ASRS captures confidential reports, analyzes the resulting aviation safety data, and disseminates vital information to the aviation community. The ASRS is an i>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.28.25)

“For our inaugural Pylon Racing Seminar in Roswell, we were thrilled to certify 60 pilots across our six closed-course pylon race classes. Not only did this year’s PRS >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC