Boeing, Spirit, Ask Judge To Dismiss Age Discrimination Suit | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.03.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.04.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.05.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Affordable Flying Expo Tickets (Discount Code: AFE2025): CLICK HERE!
LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall, 1800ET, 11.07.25: www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Aug 06, 2009

Boeing, Spirit, Ask Judge To Dismiss Age Discrimination Suit

Companies Say Suit Has No Merit, Filed Late

Boeing and Spirit Aerosystems have filed papers asking a federal judge to not grant class-action status in a suit brought by former Boeing employees who lost their jobs when Spirit bought Boeing facilities in Kansas and Oklahoma in 2005. The workers claim Spirit, which was formed by its parent company Onex Corporation of Canada after the sale, did not re-hire some Boeing workers because of their age, denying them pension benefits.

According to the Associated Press, Boeing and Spirit have filed over 900 pages of documents supporting their claim that Spirit had legitimate reasons for not re-hiring some employees. The case is being considered in U.S. District Court in Wichita.

In the court papers, the companies claim that Spirit had a need for its workforce to "be flexible and possess the skills and attitude necessary to give the new venture the best chance of success." They also say the lawsuit was not filed on time.

The former workers, for their part, cite internal memos suggesting that Spirit cut older workers, generally between the ages of 45 and 54, in a "selective re-hire" process. Workers in that age group reportedly were considered the most expensive to retain.

Boeing and Spirit counter with an argument that 85 percent of the workforce over age 40 was recommended for re-hire. About 90 former employees have filed the suit, seeking reinstatement to their positions and $1.5 billion in punitive damages, well as unspecified compensatory damages.

FMI: www.ksd.uscourts.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne-NextGen 11.04.25: Anduril YFQ-44A, Merlin SOI 2, UAV Rulemaking Stalled

Also: Horizon Picks P&W PT6A, Army Buys 3 EagleNXT, First Hybrid-Electric Regional, Army Selects AEVEX Anduril Industries’ YFQ-44A Collaborative Combat Aircraft was flown>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Elmore Travis C Searey

While Flying North Along The Beach At About 300 Ft Above Ground Level, The Pilot Reported That The Engine RPM Dropped To About Idle On September 28, 2025, at 1126 eastern daylight >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.03.25)

Aero Linx: European Association of Aviation Training and Educational Organisations (EATEO) Welcome to the “ European Association of Aviation Training and Education Organizati>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.03.25): On-Course Indication

On-Course Indication An indication on an instrument, which provides the pilot a visual means of determining that the aircraft is located on the centerline of a given navigational t>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.03.25)

“It also gives us the hard data we need to shape requirements, reduce risk, and ensure the CCA program delivers combat capability on a pace and scale that keeps us ahead of t>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC