FAA: Proposed Stadium For LA A 'Presumed Hazard To Navigation' | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.16.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.17.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.18.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-06.19.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.20.25

Mon, Nov 16, 2015

FAA: Proposed Stadium For LA A 'Presumed Hazard To Navigation'

Building Could Interfere With KLAX Radar

For years, the National Football League has wanted a team in Los Angeles. The nation's second-largest television market has been without an NFL franchise since the Raiders returned to Oakland in northern California in 1994.

The most recent team reportedly set to move to LA is the St. Louis Rams. The franchise has a history in LA. But the plan to move the team to LA into a shiny new stadium in Inglewood, CA has run into an unexpected roadblock, in the form of the FAA.

The agency on Monday issued a 27-page report that in its essence says that the stadium in its present location would be a "presumed hazard to navigation" in that it could interfere with the radar that tracks inbound to LKAX. According to the Los Angeles Times, the report states that "The configuration of the stadium between the two runways coupled with the uncertainty of its reflective properties is the root cause of the objection to this proposal."

The report comes as the proposed stadium has been entitled and designed, and planners say that much of the work to prepare the 290-acre site for construction has been completed.

The FAA has offered some possible solutions, including reducing the height of the building by more than 100 feet, reshaping the exterior, or covering some of the surfaces in a material that is absorptive rather than reflective. A "stealth" stadium, perhaps.

The FAA began its review of the project in June. It found that the building's height could create false images of aircraft, or garble images seen by controllers on radar screens. "This is a critical area requiring precision monitoring of all aircraft activity," the report said.

The LA Times reports that a spokesman for the FAA stressed that the report is not the final word on the subject, but rather an opening point for negotiations with the project's backers. The project's managers told the paper that the FAA report was nothing that was outside the normal course of doing business.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: North American T-28B

Pilot Started To Return To The Airport Before Electing To Land On A Nearby Dirt Road On May 17, 2025, at 1022 Pacific daylight time, a North American T-28B, N28DE, was substantiall>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: David Uhl and the Lofty Art of Aircraft Portraiture

From 2022 (YouTube Edition): Still Life with Verve David Uhl was born into a family of engineers and artists—a backdrop conducive to his gleaning a keen appreciation for the >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.18.25)

“On the average mission, a jet-fueled DeltaHawk engine is up to 40% more efficient than an Avgas engine—improving range, increasing available payload and lowering cost >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.18.25): Fuel Remaining

Fuel Remaining A phrase used by either pilots or controllers when relating to the fuel remaining on board until actual fuel exhaustion. When transmitting such information in respon>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC