Sat, Nov 01, 2003
In a statement issued
by Sandel Avionics, ANN has learned that a summary judgment
issued by the US District Court in Delaware has ruled that
Sandel does not infringe on any of Honeywell's
Terrain Avoidance Warning System (TAWS) patents, ending more than
17 months of legal action by Honeywell.
Two weeks ago, the same court ruled that more than 20 of
Honeywell's other claims relating to the display elements of the
same patents were invalid.
Together, the rulings confirm that
Sandel is not subject to liability for infringement and faces no
risk of damages or injunction due to Honeywell's action. Commenting
on the decision rendered by Judge Mary Pat Thynge, Sandel CEO Gerry
Block said, "This is absolutely a huge win. My firm belief has
always been that Sandel's independently developed technology was
unique and innovative, and did not infringe any of Honeywell's
patents. This ruling confirms that, and also ensures that aviation
customers will have the choice of a better way to display terrain
and safety data."
In a reversal of roles, Sandel is now taking Honeywell to trial
on the issue of whether Honeywell's remaining patents are actually
valid. In addition, Sandel expects to seek an award of attorney's
fees from the U.S. District Court based on Honeywell's action, as
well as on its misconduct in continuing to press claims that it
knew to be without merit.
Honeywell Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties Inc.,
Honeywell's patent holding company, had alleged that Sandel
Avionics Inc. and several other companies infringed Honeywell's
patents relating to its Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System
(EGPWS), Honeywell's version of TAWS. Honeywell filed the case in
May 2002, just days after Sandel announced the FAA certification of
its ST3400 Terrain Awareness and Warning System (TAWS).
The FAA had earlier issued a mandate requiring most turbine
aircraft to install an FAA certified TAWS by 2005. Honeywell, which
had assisted the FAA in preparing the TAWS regulations,
subsequently sued a number of other TAWS manufacturers, claiming it
held five patents that effectively precluded competition in the
TAWS market.
More News
Aero Linx: Transport Canada We are a federal institution, leading the Transport Canada portfolio and working with our partners. Transport Canada is responsible for transportation p>[...]
Gross Navigation Error (GNE) A lateral deviation from a cleared track, normally in excess of 25 Nautical Miles (NM). More stringent standards (for example, 10NM in some parts of th>[...]
From AirVenture 2017 (YouTube Edition): Flight-Proven Booster On Display At AirVenture… EAA AirVenture Oshkosh is known primarily as a celebration of experimental and amateu>[...]
Aircraft Parachute System (CAPS) Was Deployed About 293 Ft Above Ground Level, Which Was Too Low To Allow For Full Deployment Of The Parachute System Analysis: The day before the a>[...]
Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]
ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.29.25)
See All