Documentary Shows 'Underwear Bomber' Would Not Have Brought Down Plane | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.21.25

Airborne-Unlimited-07.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.23.25

Airborne-Unlimited-07.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.25.25

Sat, Mar 13, 2010

Documentary Shows 'Underwear Bomber' Would Not Have Brought Down Plane

Tests Show A330 Fuselage Would Not Have Been Breached

While admitting there are some discrepancies, a documentary produced by the BBC, which aired this week on The Discovery Channel, maintains that the bomb allegedly carried by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab would not have been strong enough to bring down the Northwest A330 as it descended into Detroit on December 25th.

In the program "How Safe Are Our Skies," the producers used a PETN device they say was identical to the one allegedly carried by Abdulmutallab, and detonated it inside the fuselage of a decommissioned 747 in a position identical to the one occupied by the alleged bomber. Video of the event shows the outer skin of the aircraft bulging and rippling from the force of the explosion, but it does not open a hole in the side of the airplane. Captain J. Joseph, identified in the documentary as an aviation expert, said the explosion popped a few rivets out of the skin, but there would not have been any explosive decompression of the airplane. "The actual aircraft would have remained intact," he told Discovery News.

The documentary concludes that, had the bombing been successful, the bomber and the person sitting next to him would have been killed, but most passengers and crew would have survived the explosion. Many would have suffered ruptured eardrums from the shock wave created by the blast.

While a decommissioned 747 is not exactly a newer A330, the documentary producers say that works in the test's favor. The composite materials used in the A330 fuselage are stronger than the older aircraft's aluminum skin, and would have withstood the blast better. They also say that, because the attempt came at about 10,000 feet as the airplane was descending to land, the differences in air pressure between the inside of the aircraft and ambient pressure would not have been great enough to be a significant factor.

FMI: www.bbc.co.uk, www.discovery.com

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 07.21.25: Nighthawk!, Hartzell Expands, Deltahawk 350HP!

Also: New Lakeland Fly-in!, Gleim's DPE, MOSAIC! Nearly three-quarters of a century in the making, EAA is excited about the future… especially with the potential of a MOSAIC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.27.25): Estimated (EST)

Estimated (EST) -When used in NOTAMs “EST” is a contraction that is used by the issuing authority only when the condition is expected to return to service prior to the >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.27.25)

Aero Linx: Regional Airline Association (RAA) Regional airlines provide critical links connecting communities throughout North America to the national and international air transpo>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Luce Buttercup

The Airplane Broke Up In Flight And Descended To The Ground. The Debris Path Extended For About 1,435 Ft. Analysis: The pilot, who was the owner and builder of the experimental, am>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: 'That's All Brother'-Restoring a True Piece of Military History

From 2015 (YouTube version): History Comes Alive Thanks to A Magnificent CAF Effort The story of the Douglas C-47 named, “That’s all Brother,” is fascinating from>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC