Families Push Boeing, DOJ for Answers in 737 MAX Case | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Wed, Apr 23, 2025

Families Push Boeing, DOJ for Answers in 737 MAX Case

Victims' Families Ask Judge to Set a Deadline for Plea Deal Before Trial

The families of those killed in the 2018 and 2019 Boeing 737 MAX crashes are done waiting in the dark. They recently filed a motion in federal court urging the judge to set a firm deadline—May 5—for Boeing and the Justice Department to reach a settlement in the ongoing fraud case tied to the crashes.

A jury trial is currently set for June 23, and families deserve to know if that’s really happening.

Their request follows months of back-and-forth between Boeing and the DOJ, which have been trying (and failing) to strike a new plea deal. The families argue that if an agreement is reached too close to trial, they won't have enough time to prepare, travel, or even process what’s next. “Grieving families need advance notice,” the motion states.

The families also sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi on February 6, just one day after she was sworn in, requesting a meeting about the potential deal. They haven’t received any sort of response, leaving them with no clear idea of whether the trial will move forward or be derailed by a last-minute plea.

This all stems from a 2024 accusation by the Biden DOJ that Boeing had violated its original 2021 plea agreement, which was tied to the deadly crashes that killed 346 people in Indonesia and Ethiopia. The new plea deal, drafted last July, called for Boeing to plead guilty to one felony charge. Judge Reed O’Connor rejected it in December, citing concerns that the DOJ’s diversity and inclusion policies might affect how the court-appointed monitor was selected.

Since then, O’Connor has extended the deadline for Boeing and the DOJ to sort things out… three times. But as of late March, the judge put his foot down and scheduled the trial. Boeing now has a court date and a charge to answer for as it battles the chaotic international supply chain scene.

In a March statement, Boeing said it’s still engaged in “good faith discussions” with the DOJ. The families, however, would like a little less faith and a little more clarity.

FMI: www.boeing.com

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Rutan Long-EZ

He Attempted To Restart The Engine Three Times. On The Third Restart Attempt, He Noticed That Flames Were Coming Out From The Right Wing Near The Fuel Cap Analysis: The pilot repor>[...]

ANN FAQ: Turn On Post Notifications

Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: ICAS Perspectives - Advice for New Air Show Performers

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Leading Air Show Performers Give Their Best Advice for Newcomers On December 6th through December 9th, the Paris Las Vegas Hotel hosted over 1,500 air >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.28.25)

Aero Linx: NASA ASRS ASRS captures confidential reports, analyzes the resulting aviation safety data, and disseminates vital information to the aviation community. The ASRS is an i>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.28.25)

“For our inaugural Pylon Racing Seminar in Roswell, we were thrilled to certify 60 pilots across our six closed-course pylon race classes. Not only did this year’s PRS >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC