Reaction To Pending Approval of FAA Reauthorization Bill
The House of Representatives last week passed the huge FAA
Reauthorization Bill, sending it on to the Senate where it's
expected to be the subject of debate in the coming week. There are,
of course, those who like it and those who don't. Here's a brief
sampling...
NBAA Commends House Leaders For Passage Of FAA Reauthorization
Bill
The National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) Friday praised
the U.S. House of Representatives for passage of critical aviation
legislation and called for Senate leaders to act quickly to ensure
final passage by Congress before the end of next week.

NBAA President and CEO Shelley A. Longmuir commended House
Aviation Subcommittee Chairman John Mica (R-FL) and House Committee
on Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman Don Young (R-AK) in
particular for their leadership in gaining passage of H.R. 2115,
Vision 100 - The Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act, which is
critically important to all sectors of the aviation industry. "As I
have emphasized before, this legislation provides for a strategic
investment in an industry that feeds our national, regional and
local economic engines," stated Longmuir.
Of particular importance to the general aviation community is
the bill's call for increased investment in general aviation
airports, $100 million in aid to general aviation entities harmed
by the events of September 11, and a plan to restore access for all
security-qualified general aviation operators to Ronald Reagan
Washington National Airport (DCA).

"NBAA's 7,500 Members rely on a safe, secure and efficient
aviation system for time-critical, mission-driven transportation in
communities all over the globe," said Longmuir. "Passage of this
bill will inject nearly $60 billion of critical and timely
investment in the nation's aviation system."
On the other hand, there are those who just don't like it at all
-- at least, not the provision that calls for privatization of 69
air traffic control towers...
Litigation not Privatization
The Republican controlled Congress was able to pull it off and
get the Aviation Bill through the House in spite of intense
lobbying, against it, from concerned parties. Now, it goes to the
Senate where the Democrats have threatened a filibuster.....and so
they should.

PATCO does not support the privatization of Air Traffic
Controllers or other Federal Jobs and it should be recognized for
what it is....the Reagan agenda. The FAA/Bush plan is to
accelerate this anti-PATCO policy and preserve the legacy of
President Reagan. When Reagan fired the PATCO Air Traffic
Controllers in the strike of 1981 and banned them for life,
he promised the American public that he would rebuild the Air
Traffic Control system. His plan was smoke and mirrors which
included the closing of FAA small towers and contracting them
out to non-union contractors and kept the PATCO controllers out of
the FAA. Years later, and trillions of dollars of taxpayers
monies spent, the failed plan and truth of the Reagan agenda is
clear and concise...dismantle the system, sub- out the Professional
workers, and continue to keep the majority of PATCO
controllers “Locked Out” in spite of the ban being
lifted by President Clinton.
FAA Administrator, Marion Blakey,
recently said she is concerned over FAA future staffing needs
because of the number of retirements expected among current Air
Traffic Controllers, but she fails to mention the available source
of PATCO Controllers that her agency has discriminated
against and refused to hire. She is silent about the Federal Age
Discrimination lawsuit that has been filed in Miami, Florida
on behalf of thousands of highly qualified PATCO Controllers who
reapplied for their jobs and yet, are still illegally locked
out.....interesting.
The FAA is breaking the law and the Bush Administration’s
policy on privatization is nothing more than a sham, designed to
ignore and suppress the PATCO Controllers and continue the failed
Reagan policy. Litigation not privatization is where the
truth lies, and therefore, we must trust only in a court of
law.