Update: LODA Restrictions Finally Abandoned By Congress | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date



Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday


Airborne On YouTube






Thu, Jan 05, 2023

Update: LODA Restrictions Finally Abandoned By Congress

"It Was Never Anything But A Bureaucratic Paper Chase"

Our friends at SAFE (The Society of Aviation and Flight Educators) have been celebrating the elimination of a particularly onerous bit of FAA decision-making... by virtue of an act of Congress. H.R. 7776, the “James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023”  -- which was passed by both the House and Senate and signed into law by the President just before year's end.

The FAA policy, established in July 2021, required certain aircraft owners and flight instructors to obtain a letter of deviation authority (LODA) prior to providing flight training in experimental aircraft—including the owners of homebuilt aircraft seeking training in their own machines.

The unforeseen 2021 policy change engendered a great deal of confusion among pilots and aircraft owners and forced the FAA to hastily adopt the LODA workaround lest tens-of-thousands of aviators found themselves summarily grounded.

The corrective Bill eliminates the FAA policy change last year that required a Letter of Deviation Authority (LODA) to give or receive flight training in an experimental aircraft. Prime movers for the measure were Reps. Sam Graves (R-Mo.), Rick Larsen (D-Wash.), Kai Kahele (D-Hawaii) and Senators Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) and Roger Wicker (R-Miss.).

Sec. 5604 of the Bill states:

"A flight instructor, registered owner, lessor, or lessee of an aircraft shall not be required to obtain a letter of deviation authority from the [FAA administrator] to allow, conduct, or receive flight training, checking and testing in an experimental aircraft if 1) the flight instructor is not providing both the training and the aircraft; 2) no person advertises or broadly offers the aircraft as available for flighty training, checking, or testing; and 3) no person receives compensation for use of the aircraft for a specific flight during which flight training, checking, or testing was received, other than expenses for owning, operating, and maintaining the aircraft."

"It was never anything but a bureaucratic paper chase," said SAFE Executive Director David St George. "It actually decreased safety, which is the opposite of what the FAA is supposed to do." SAFE had been among the many GA organizations vociferously demanding this correction in policy.

FMI: www.congress.gov, www.faa.gov, www.safepilots.org



More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.21.24)

Aero Linx: WACO Historical Society The WACO Aircraft Company was the largest manufacturer of civil aircraft in the country in the late 1920's and early 30's and this museum is dedi>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.21.24): Radar Flight Following

Radar Flight Following The observation of the progress of radar-identified aircraft, whose primary navigation is being provided by the pilot, wherein the controller retains and cor>[...]

Airborne 07.17.24: Illegal Parts, Fantasy of Flight, Apollo 11's 55th

Also: Aerox, WI ANG, HI Helo Accident, Gulfstream Expansion Another criminal case involving non-airworthy parts swappage has seen the sentencing of those involved, costing the perp>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 07.16.24: Joby Record, Pelican Spray, Beta’s ALIA

Also: UAS4STEM, uAvionix Waiver, 1st J-1 Pulsejets, ZeroAvia Hydrogen Joby Aviation managed to pull off a 523-mile flight using their hybrid electric/hydrogen VTOL aircraft, once a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.22.24)

Aero Linx: Michigan Department of Transportation Aeronautics is an integral part of our transportation system, moving people and goods throughout the world. The airports that suppo>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus





© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC