CWA Blasts Board For Conclusion That Management Did Not Coerce
Members To Vote "No"
The National Mediation Board late last week notified Delta
Airlines that it has rejected claims of interference filed by the
Association of Flight Attendants (AFA) following the November 2010
Delta flight attendant representation election. With its ruling,
the NMB has upheld the decision of a majority of voters to reject
AFA representation, allowing Delta flight attendants to move
forward as a combined workgroup. Still pending are interference
claims relating to representation elections for employees in
Delta's Airport Customer Service, Cargo, Reservation Sales and
TechOps Stores groups. The majority of voters in these elections
also rejected union representation.
"We have always believed that our flight attendants' voices and
votes should be respected," said Joanne Smith, senior vice
president – In-Flight Service. "We take very seriously our
commitment to helping our employees take advantage of the full
benefits of the merger. To that end, we will immediately begin the
process of aligning pay, benefits, work rules and seniority for our
flight attendants, including bringing pre-merger Northwest flight
attendants up to the Delta flight attendant hourly pay rates."
"We are hopeful similar decisions related to those elections
will come quickly so that our people in those groups will be able
to move forward as well," said Mike Campbell, executive vice
president of H.R. and Labor Relations. "It is time to turn the page
and continue to focus on making Delta a great place to work. We
have the best men and women in the industry and I am grateful for
the professionalism they've demonstrated during the past three
years."
But the decision is being condemned by the Communications
Workers of America and the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA.
The Unions say the NMB decision throws out 60 years of bargaining
rights for the Northwest Flight Attendants and denies the Delta
Flight Attendants any say over their working conditions. The
decision ignores the outrageous interference of Delta management in
the union election among 25,000 flight attendants.
The unions contend that the NMB found that Delta urged Flight
Attendants to vote “No” as the best way to support
another Union, and also found evidence of increased supervisor
surveillance in the workplace; that Delta misstated the NMB’s
decertification procedures; incidents of supervisor threats against
Union supporters; and most revealing, that Delta ran “an
aggressive campaign against union representation.” However,
the Board concluded that this coercive conduct did not affect the
outcome. The contend Delta management launched a blatant and
persistent attack on Flight Attendants’ rights to fairly
choose a union voice and did everything possible to pressure
thousands of Flight Attendants who want union representation.
Union leadership asserts that, given the close margin of that
election, Delta continues its determination to keep workers from
having a union. This includes lobbying to shut down the FAA by
insisting that an anti-democratic voting standard for union
elections be inserted in the FAA reauthorization. The say Delta
seems to be more focused on its anti-union agenda than the
performance of the airline, since it has bumped paying passengers
to bring anti-worker lobbyists to Congress.
“With this decision, the NMB has now given a green light
to all manner of employer coercion and intimidation during
representation election that leaves employees with no recourse. It
is a shameful, illogical and cowardly decision,” said AFA-CWA
International President Veda Shook. “The NMB is clearly
afraid of the airline of the one percent that showers Members of
Congress with perks while at the same time raising its Flight
Attendants’ health insurance premiums.”