FAA: Let's Get This Clear | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-03.10.25

Airborne-NextGen-03.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-03.12.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-03.13.25

Airborne-Unlimited-03.14.25

Tune in to www.airborne-live.net to watch our exclusive coverage of AEA 2025!
March 18 - Opening Session & New Product Introductions from 0830--1200 PDT
March 19 - First Day of LIVE interviews from the show floor: 1400--1630 PDT, 
March 20 - Day 2 of LIVE Interviews from the show floor: 1100--1400 PDT

Tue, Nov 04, 2003

FAA: Let's Get This Clear

Big Difference Between 'Contract' and 'Private'

It didn't take long for our publication of an AOPA press release to ruffle some feathers in the FAA's bunker near the Potomac. Upon opening my email (and after deleting the usual 300 spams), we found a gem from Bill Shumann, who is in the FAA's public relations area.

Moments later, another appeared, from Paul Turk, who works in the same place.

Here's Mr. Shumann's message:

"In yesterday's item on the FAA reauthorization bill, you state: 'The FAA and the White House would like to see the air traffic centers in the hands of private industry.' The statement is not attributed to anyone; more importantly, it's wrong. Please show me a statement from anyone in the FAA or White House to that effect."

He continued, "A distinction that often gets overlooked in the current debate is the difference between 'contacting out' and 'privatization.' The former means the government hires and pays a contractor to perform a service under federal supervision, such as operating a contract tower. The latter means the function or service is turned over to a  private sector organization that charges for the service and is not reimbursed by the government."

In case we still didn't understand (as apparently a lot of the union and AOPA folks didn't), he added, "Privatization of ATC similar to Canada and the U. K. would require congressional approval, which, for several reasons, isn't going to happen."

[Thank you, Bill. Your message has come in loud and clear--ed.]

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (03.21.25)

“It was the proudest day of my life since joining the Royal Navy, I’m still in shock, he was funny and I was surprised he would support a team like Burnley – Newc>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (03.21.25): Discrete Code

Discrete Code As used in the Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System (ATCRBS), any one of the 4096 selectable Mode 3/A aircraft transponder codes except those ending in zero zero; >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (03.21.25)

Aero Linx: Wright Flight, Inc. Wright Flight, Inc., named after the Wright Brothers, is a unique program that began in Tucson in 1986. Wright Flight was founded by Lt. Col. Robin S>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Heath V-Strut

Pilot’s Failure To Maintain Adequate Airspeed And His Exceedance Of The Airplane’s Critical Angle Of Attack Analysis: Shortly after takeoff the pilot turned the airplan>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Ultimate Airshows -- In Flight With Rob Holland

From 2014 (YouTube Edition): Looking Back At Oshkosh 2012 With One Of The Airshow Industry's Top Fliers Top-notch aerobatic performer, Rob Holland, amazed the crowds at EAA AirVent>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC