Thu, Oct 23, 2003
After a flurry of press releases and a lot of Capitol Hill
arm-twisting by the Air Force (and presumably Boeing lobbyists) all
Summer, and a flurry of GAO reports that question the
methodology of the scheme, the Air Force on Friday made a heavy
appeal to Congress to get the KC-767A (767-based tanker) deal approved.
Senator John McCain, who has been skeptical of the leasing plan
-- or even the need for fleet replacement -- from the start, now
wants Joshua Bolten, Director of the White House Office of
Management and Budget, to submit, in writing, the reasons why the
proposed deal doesn't square with the OMB's guidelines -- or why it
shouldn't have to.
The controversy runs on two levels: until Boeing's financials
looked so really lousy (in the post-September 11 era), the Air
Force didn't have any urgent complaints about its old, but
little-used tanker fleet. In report after request, the Air Force's
"need for new tankers" wasn't up there on the list of "things we
really need." That changed recently; and -- surprise -- Boeing (the
logical choice, at any rate) just happened to have a 767-based
tanker design... almost ready to go.
The other level has to do with how the Air Force wants to pay
for the new birds, and how much of our money they're going to use,
to do just that. The price looks steep to many; and beyond that,
there's a really sweet leasing deal, that's even more expensive
(and more-expensive yet, the more information gets out). Though
there is a "price-protection" clause worked in, it's effective only
if Boeing sells similar aircraft to somebody else, for a lower
price. Just who would be bidding, and who would be allowed to take
delivery -- is a matter for not much conjecture.
At any rate, the OMB has until Tuesday to spin this deal into
something that at least looks legit. McCain's Senate Armed Services
Committee is the last of four legislative panels that needs to
approve the deal; and, assuming the spin can't cover the
"interesting" aspects of the deal, McCain's doggedness may yet save
the taxpayers a few dozen million dollars.
More News
Decision Altitude (DA) A specified altitude (mean sea level (MSL)) on an instrument approach procedure (ILS, GLS, vertically guided RNAV) at which the pilot must decide whether to >[...]
Aero Linx: T-34 Association, Inc. The T-34 Association was formed in July 1975 so that individuals purchasing then military surplus T-34As had an organization which would provide s>[...]
As He Released The Brakes To Begin Taxiing, The Brake Pedals Went To The Floor With No Braking Action Analysis: The pilot reported that during engine start up, he applied the brake>[...]
“Legislation like the Mental Health in Aviation Act is still imperative to hold the FAA accountable for the changes they clearly acknowledge need to be made... We cannot wait>[...]
Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]
ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.08.25): Decision Altitude (DA)
See All