Thu, Oct 23, 2003
After a flurry of press releases and a lot of Capitol Hill
arm-twisting by the Air Force (and presumably Boeing lobbyists) all
Summer, and a flurry of GAO reports that question the
methodology of the scheme, the Air Force on Friday made a heavy
appeal to Congress to get the KC-767A (767-based tanker) deal approved.
Senator John McCain, who has been skeptical of the leasing plan
-- or even the need for fleet replacement -- from the start, now
wants Joshua Bolten, Director of the White House Office of
Management and Budget, to submit, in writing, the reasons why the
proposed deal doesn't square with the OMB's guidelines -- or why it
shouldn't have to.
The controversy runs on two levels: until Boeing's financials
looked so really lousy (in the post-September 11 era), the Air
Force didn't have any urgent complaints about its old, but
little-used tanker fleet. In report after request, the Air Force's
"need for new tankers" wasn't up there on the list of "things we
really need." That changed recently; and -- surprise -- Boeing (the
logical choice, at any rate) just happened to have a 767-based
tanker design... almost ready to go.
The other level has to do with how the Air Force wants to pay
for the new birds, and how much of our money they're going to use,
to do just that. The price looks steep to many; and beyond that,
there's a really sweet leasing deal, that's even more expensive
(and more-expensive yet, the more information gets out). Though
there is a "price-protection" clause worked in, it's effective only
if Boeing sells similar aircraft to somebody else, for a lower
price. Just who would be bidding, and who would be allowed to take
delivery -- is a matter for not much conjecture.
At any rate, the OMB has until Tuesday to spin this deal into
something that at least looks legit. McCain's Senate Armed Services
Committee is the last of four legislative panels that needs to
approve the deal; and, assuming the spin can't cover the
"interesting" aspects of the deal, McCain's doggedness may yet save
the taxpayers a few dozen million dollars.
More News
Airplane Bounced About 3 Ft Then Touched Back Down And Then, With No Brakes Applied, The Airplane Began Veering To The Left Analysis: The pilot entered the airport traffic pattern >[...]
Aero Linx: British Microlight Aircraft Association (BMAA) The primary focus within all aviation activity is SAFETY. In all aspects of our sport SAFETY must come first, whether it b>[...]
From SnF25 (YouTube Edition): William Wynne Builds Practical Aircraft Engines on the Corvair Platform Seeking an affordable alternative to the traditional aircraft engine options, >[...]
How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]
From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Bridge of CiES CiES Inc. is a Bend, Oregon-based designer and manufacturer of modular embedded aircraft systems and sensors. The company’s fuel-l>[...]
NTSB Final Report: Aviat A1
See All