Tue, Oct 11, 2016
New International Agreement Covers Armed UAVs
A joint declaration signed by 44 nations overseeing the sale of armed UAVs may favor non-U.S. companies over American manufacturers.

"Soft language" in the joint declaration could give foreign companies an edge if the language in the document contains standards that are lower than U.S. standards, according to a report from the Washington Examiner. The agreement requires a commitment to "responsible export" of armed UAVs and an ongoing conversation about the standards for drone sales and the use of those aircraft including drone strikes. Those must be conducted in accordance with "international law".
A State Department fact sheet indicates that further discussions about the specifics of the proposal will be conducted in the spring.
The Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) said in a statement that it is supportive of U.S. government efforts to promote international adoption of the Joint Declaration for the Export and Subsequent Use of Armed or Strike-Enabled Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). "If our allies and security cooperation partners understand clearly and follow consistently the principles embedded in the Declaration, industry expects more efficient review and approval of U.S. exports of these systems. Further, the international adoption of these guidelines for armed and strike-enabled UAVs should also expedite the approval process for unarmed UAV exports for military end use, such as intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, as well as civilian and commercial use," said Vice President for International Affairs at the Aerospace Industries Association Remy Nathan.
"However, if other countries’ UAV systems predominate in the global market, and U.S. companies continue to lose market share to their foreign competitors, the United States could lose the leverage necessary to ensure that the Joint Declaration principles become the norm. Therefore, in addition to diplomatic efforts to promote the Joint Declaration, we also call on the U.S. government to make the interagency review and approval process for these exports more transparent, predictable and efficient to ensure that American UAV systems – and American principles on their export and subsequent use – will be the global standard," Nathan said.
In an editorial appearing in Defense News, Rachel Stohl, a senior associate at the Stimson Center, said that the restrictions in the joint declaration are "less robust" than those already in place for U.S. manufacturers. Those more restrictive policies could have a detrimental effect on U.S. businesses, she said.
(Image from file)
More News
Decision Altitude (DA) A specified altitude (mean sea level (MSL)) on an instrument approach procedure (ILS, GLS, vertically guided RNAV) at which the pilot must decide whether to >[...]
Aero Linx: T-34 Association, Inc. The T-34 Association was formed in July 1975 so that individuals purchasing then military surplus T-34As had an organization which would provide s>[...]
As He Released The Brakes To Begin Taxiing, The Brake Pedals Went To The Floor With No Braking Action Analysis: The pilot reported that during engine start up, he applied the brake>[...]
“Legislation like the Mental Health in Aviation Act is still imperative to hold the FAA accountable for the changes they clearly acknowledge need to be made... We cannot wait>[...]
Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]