Photographer Acquitted On UAV Charges | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.19.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.21.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.23.25

Wed, Jun 24, 2015

Photographer Acquitted On UAV Charges

Jury Found David Beesmer Not Guilty Of Attempted Unlawful Surveillance

The murky legal waters surrounding UAV photography may have gotten a little clearer this week when an Ulster County, NY man was found not guilty of using his aircraft for Unlawful Surveillance.

David Beesmer had been arrested in 2014 after capturing video of the outside of a medical building in the town of Ulster. Beesmer said he knew that the camera on the quadcopter would not be able to see into the windows of the Mid-Hudson Medical Group building, but also admits that it was a "huge error in judgement" to aim the camera at exam rooms in the building.

Television Station WXXA reports that Beesmer stood trial on charges of Attempted Unlawful Surveillance twice. The first trial ended in a mistrial in May after the jury was allowed to see evidence of a previous arrest that was supposed to have been suppressed, according to the Daily Freeman newspaper.

In the second trial, which concluded Monday, the jury of six women deliberated for about 70 minutes before returning a verdict of "not guilty." They did ask to review the video captured by Beesmer of the four-story medical building.

The Daily Freeman reports that Beesmer said that his biggest fear was that the jury would have voted on emotion rather than the law, but he maintained his innocence the proceedings. He said that the state police who arrested him did not review the footage that he had captured.

Prosecutors framed the incident as "video voyeurism", and said patients in examining rooms of a medical facility have a "heightened expectation of privacy." After the verdict, Ulster County Assistant District Attorney Thomas Colonna said he would not question the jury's findings, but said it is a "situation that warrants monitoring."

Beesmer reportedly purchased the UAV to use in his music video business "Front Row Dave." It was not reported whether he has obtained a Section 333 waiver to use his aircraft for commercial purposes.

(File image of UAV similar to Beesmer's)

FMI: http://townofulster.org/content/Courts/View/1

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: Lee Aviation LLC JA30 SuperStol

A Puff Of Smoke Came Out From The Top Of The Engine Cowling Followed By A Total Loss Of Engine Power On May 9, 2025, about 1020 mountain daylight time, an experimental amateur-buil>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Curtiss Jenny Build Wows AirVenture Crowds

From 2022 (YouTube Edition): Jenny, I’ve Got Your Number... Among the magnificent antique aircraft on display at EAA’s AirVenture 2022 was a 1918 Curtiss Jenny painstak>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.25): Very High Frequency (VHF)

Very High Frequency (VHF) The frequency band between 30 and 300 MHz. Portions of this band, 108 to 118 MHz, are used for certain NAVAIDs; 118 to 136 MHz are used for civil air/grou>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.30.25)

“From approximately November 2021 through January 2022, Britton-Harr, acting on behalf of AeroVanti, entered into lease-purchase agreements for five Piaggio-manufactured airc>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.31.25): Microburst

Microburst A small downburst with outbursts of damaging winds extending 2.5 miles or less. In spite of its small horizontal scale, an intense microburst could induce wind speeds as>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC