Airport Neighbors: Don't Extend The Runway | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Fri, Nov 19, 2004

Airport Neighbors: Don't Extend The Runway

Philadelphia International Gets An Earful About Noise

If you ask a lot of people around West Deptford Township (NJ), they don't want Philadelphia International's Runway 17-35 to be extended 400 feet in their direction -- they don't want the runway at all.

About 60 people, many of them township residents, showed up at a public hearing conducted by the FAA Tuesday night, opposed to the runway extension project. Specifically, two of the three alternatives under consideration would extend the runway south, toward the small New Jersey town. Residents say that would mean more pollution and more noise.

Steve Drummond not only doesn't want to see the runway extended toward his home in West Deptford. "I'd like to see 17-35 shut down entirely," he said. He was quoted in the Gloucester County Times.

Another resident hoping to add his displeasure to the testimony being gathered for the project's environmental impact statement was Judy Shillingford. "When the planes go over my house, it's deafening," she said. "I can't imagine what the quality of life will be in my neighborhood if this goes through."

Residents like Drummond and Shillingford have until the first of December to tell the FAA what they think about the idea of extending 17-35. The City of Philadelphia, which runs the airport, says it needs to extend the runway because of congestion.

Ironically, the FAA says not extending the runway could be even worse for the angry airport neighbors. They could see a "continued increase in aircraft noise from growth in airport operations," the report stated.

The federal EIS isn't the last stop for the proposed project. It still has to pass muster with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, US Army Corps of Engineers and the US Environmental Protection Agency.

FMI: www.phl.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.29.25)

Aero Linx: Transport Canada We are a federal institution, leading the Transport Canada portfolio and working with our partners. Transport Canada is responsible for transportation p>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.29.25): Gross Navigation Error (GNE)

Gross Navigation Error (GNE) A lateral deviation from a cleared track, normally in excess of 25 Nautical Miles (NM). More stringent standards (for example, 10NM in some parts of th>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Anticipating Futurespace - Blue Origin Visits Airventure 2017

From AirVenture 2017 (YouTube Edition): Flight-Proven Booster On Display At AirVenture… EAA AirVenture Oshkosh is known primarily as a celebration of experimental and amateu>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus SR22

Aircraft Parachute System (CAPS) Was Deployed About 293 Ft Above Ground Level, Which Was Too Low To Allow For Full Deployment Of The Parachute System Analysis: The day before the a>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.26.25: PA18 Upgrades, ‘Delta Force’, Rhinebeck

Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC