NTSB Final Report: Aeronca 11AC | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.07.24

Airborne-NextGen-10.08.24

Airborne-Unlimited-10.02.24

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-10.03.24

Airborne-Unlimited-10.04.24

Wed, Jun 26, 2024

NTSB Final Report: Aeronca 11AC

Airplane’s Climb Rate Was Insufficient To Avoid The Trees At The Departure End Of The Runway

Location: Conyers, Georgia Accident Number: ERA24LA183
Date & Time: March 31, 2024, 13:00 Local Registration: N3420E
Aircraft: Aeronca 11AC Aircraft Damage: Substantial
Defining Event: Runway excursion Injuries: 1 Minor, 1 None
Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal

Analysis: The pilot was taking off from a 2,700-ft-long runway and described that during the initial climb, the airplane’s climb rate was insufficient to avoid the trees at the departure end of the runway. The pilot attempted to land on the remaining runway; however, the airplane departed the far end of the runway, impacted a berm, and came to rest in a lake. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the wings and fuselage. The pilot reported that the engine was operating normally and that there were no anomalies or mechanical failures that would have precluded normal operation of the airplane.

Three of the closest official weather stations reported the wind was varying between being a quartering headwind to a quartering tailwind. The pilot reported receiving the weather conditions from an online, publicly available weather station, which reported that a headwind would be present for takeoff. He also provided a plot of the data from that station for the time surrounding accident, and it showed that while the wind direction was reported as he described, it had also begun to vary around that time, and continued to for some time afterward. Based on this information, it is likely that the variable wind conditions resulted in a shift in wind direction during takeoff that changed from a quartering headwind to a quartering tailwind.

Probable Cause and Findings: The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be -- An encounter with shifting wind conditions, which resulted in the airplane using more runway than anticipated, an aborted takeoff, and subsequent runway excursion. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s failure account for the potential of variable and shifting wind in his departure planning.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.06.24): Approach Speed

Approach Speed The recommended speed contained in aircraft manuals used by pilots when making an approach to landing. This speed will vary for different segments of an approach as >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.06.24)

“While on Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) alert in East Africa, Pedro 11 Flight received a casualty evacuation request for two civilian children with life-sustaining injuries>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: David Uhl and the Lofty Art of Aircraft Portraiture

From 2022 (YouTube Edition): Still Life with Verve David Uhl was born into a family of engineers and artists—a backdrop conducive to his gleaning a keen appreciation for the >[...]

NTSB Final Report: Wonder Michael S Harmon Rocket

Pilot’s Routine Performance Of High-Speed Flyovers And Low-Altitude Aerobatics Was Indicative Of High-Risk Behavior Analysis: According to witnesses, the pilot took off and p>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.07.24)

“Dynon is committed to enhancing flight safety and reducing pilot workload. We’re thrilled to expand the SkyView HDX Autopilot to Mooney M20J and M20K pilots. This adva>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC