After 17 Years, FAA Finally Upgrades Airline Seat Rules | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-
10.14.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.15.25

Airborne-NextGen-10.16.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Thu, Oct 20, 2005

After 17 Years, FAA Finally Upgrades Airline Seat Rules

Stronger Seats Designed To Increase Crash Survivability

It's the kind of story for which you might want a fanfare. Something bold and brassy. After all, this has been a long-time coming.

After 17-years, the FAA has finally completed work on its rule requiring stronger passenger seats on commercial flights. The rule will affect aircraft built after 2009.

The seats will have to withstand 16-Gs -- compared to the 9-G requirement currently in effect. Same goes for the cabin floors and the tracks upon which the seats are mounted.

The rule does not require aircraft manufacturers to retrofit aircraft currently in service. That's a tip of the hat to the industry turmoil that broke out after the terrorist attacks of 2001.

Aircraft built since the 1990s already have seats that can withstand 16-Gs.

"It was not worth the minute safety benefit for retrofits," said John Hickey, director of FAA's Aircraft Certification Service, quoted by the Washington Post. "It's the right, sweet-spot solution -- it gives passengers the safety benefit at a very reasonable cost."

Indeed, the Post reports a retrofit solution would have cost the industry $519 million. The current solution will cost approximately $34 million between 2009 and 2034. In that period, the FAA estimates the airline industry will take delivery on 1,752 new aircraft with a total of 225,274 passenger seats.

"From a carrier perspective, this rule makes sense," Basil J. Barimo, vice president of operations and safety for the Air Transport Association, told the Post. "The FAA recognized they had a difficult case to make with retrofit design because a significant number of seats had already been replaced with 16-G compatible seats."

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 10.15.25: Phantom 3500 Confounds, Citation CJ3 Gen2 TC, True Blue Power

Also: Kodiak 100 Joins USFS, Innovative Solutions & Support Renamed, Gulfstream Selects Honeywell, Special Olympics Airlift The Phantom 3500 mockup made an appearance where the>[...]

Updated: Gryder Arrested On Gun Charge, Cites ‘Georgia Stand Your Ground’ Law

Incidents Allegedly Occured As Described in Police Report(s) 25-005809 and 25-005818 The name ’Dan Gryder’ is fairly well known to many in aviation.... Whether you like>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.18.25)

“Recent U.S. government policy updates emphasizing investment in domestic drone manufacturing align perfectly with our joint venture objectives, positioning us to meet critic>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.18.25): Final Approach Point

Final Approach Point The point, applicable only to a nonprecision approach with no depicted FAF (such as an on airport VOR), where the aircraft is established inbound on the final >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Eyeing the Hawk

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): The Best of the Eighties in the Early Twenties It can be argued with confidence that the father of the Ultralight aircraft from which the Light-Sport A>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC