Tamarack Denies NTSB Blame | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-SpecialEpisode-12.15.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.16.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.12.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Sun, Nov 07, 2021

Tamarack Denies NTSB Blame

Says 2018 Citation Crash Report Self-Contradictory

Tamarack has disputed the findings of probable cause in the NTSB’s final report of a 2018 crash of Cessna Citation N525EG.

The Board faulted Tamarack’s Active Winglet system, alleging that the crash was the result of an “asymmetric deployment of the leftwing load alleviation system for undetermined reasons.” Tamarack states that forensic evidence collected in the course of the investigation proved that the load alleviation was indeed functioning correctly and deploying symmetrically upon impact. Additionally, the company points out a number of inconsistencies and omissions in the official report. 

First, they note that the NTSB’s final report states the aircraft was rolling at 5 degrees per second, when the autopilot automatically disconnected at 30 degrees of bank, not, as a functioning Citation autopilot would, at 45 degrees of bank or 10 degrees per second. They note the failure of the investigation to account for the premature autopilot disconnect and inappropriate automated response for an excessive bank condition. 

Tamarack notes their full cooperation throughout the investigation, but says the NTSB published a revised Factual Report, then the Final Report, without taking into consideration alternative causes.

Their supplemental data paints a picture of target fixation on the part of the agency, as if the concept of an active aerodynamics system was so clearly the cause of the crash that it precluded serious effort into any other avenue. They recall that the Final Report includes information that the pilot was able to carry out some corrective action late in the flight at very high speeds, but fail to make mention that, if there were an active winglet failure, then the aircraft would have been easier to recover at slower speeds. They point to this as a possible lead in understanding the true source of the incident. 

They note with sadness the casualties of the accident, and wish to ascertain everything possible that they may prevent future loss of another member of their Citation family. 

FMI www.tamarackaero.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.18.25)

“These new aircraft strengthen our ability to respond quickly, train effectively and support communities nationwide. Textron Aviation has been a steadfast supporter in helpin>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Viking Twin Otter 400--Bringing the DHC-6 Back Into Production

From 2011 (YouTube Edition): Rugged, Legendary, STOL Twin Makes A Comeback The de Havilland Twin Otter is an airplane with a long history, and it gained a reputation as a workhorse>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Rans Employee Flying Club Rans S-6ES Coyote II

A Wind Gust Lifted The Right Wing And The Airplane Turned To The Left Analysis: The pilot was departing from a 2,395-ft-long by 50-ft-wide turf runway. The pilot reported that afte>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.18.25): Braking Action Advisories

Braking Action Advisories When tower controllers receive runway braking action reports which include the terms “medium," “poor," or “nil," or whenever weather con>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC