Thu, Dec 09, 2021
Pilot Hyperfocused on Filming Mountain, Brought Wing Into Contact With Ridge Face
A Swiss SUST report has been released in regards to a 2016 glider crash wherein a DG-800S glider crashed against the Mittaghore Mountains while on a leisure flight. The report cites the pilot's preoccupation with manipulating his cellular phone to film while flying, resulting in an inadvertent collision between the aircraft's right wing and a nearby mountain ridge.
The Glider was towed into flight from Saanen Airfield on July 6, 2016, where the pilot released the cable to fly along the ridge of Sanetschsee and its pass. Passing through the Arpelistock, the pilot turned towards the nearby mountains with the hopes of approaching the large, imposing summit of Mittaghore for some footage. The glider flew along a ridge, coming within 70 m of the horizontal peak and 110 meters above ground level.
The aircraft passed through a variation of terrain, ultimately maneuvering such a prominently rising portion of Mittaghore was obscured by the instrument panel while filming the interior of the aircraft. The camera was positioned to emphasize the scenic view out the right side, then passed over the pilot's head to capture the widest summit photo possible. The camera panned towards a further mountain as the formerly obscured terrain collided with the right wing of the glider. The aircraft rolled clockwise around its longitudinal and vertial axes. It inverted and impacted the eastern side of Mittaghore and slid downhill for 140 meters, killing the pilot in the process.
The accident occurred on an otherwise fine day for flying, providing another strong warning for the new crop of younger aviators accustomed to filming their activities at all times. Regulations aside, there have been a number of horror stories in most clubs about what can go wrong when flying the plane takes a back seat to getting the perfect shot. From small action cameras broken parts blocking the throttles, to inattentive student pilots rolling inverted while reviewing their camera roll, luck can only cover for so much airborne safety before giving out. For clubs or owners, it may be a helpful risk assessment guide to set standards of minimum filming requirements while in the air, whether they necessitate attachments for hands-off 'set it and forget it' operation, or a second crewmember to handle the in-flight electronics. The report in its entirety can be read in its native German at the Swiss Confederation's SUST website.
More News
Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) Charts Portray the aeronautical data which is required to execute an instrument approach to an airport. These charts depict the procedures, incl>[...]
“Our industry is approaching a 30-year innovation cycle, and we have less than 25 years to decarbonize aviation. We need to develop new methods to get net zero aerospace tech>[...]
Also: Girls in Aviation Day, B-29 Doc Heads 4 Chino, C-17 Tail Cone Detaches, Bulgaria Airshow Accident One of two private aircraft that launched from Apatity Airport near Murmansk>[...]
From 2021 (YouTube Version): We Were Blown Away At How Well The Nosewheel Was Adapted To The X Cub Airframe It should not be a secret to any one of you, that with thousands of hour>[...]
Also: Volato Nixed by Honda, New B-21 Bases, A-10 Unit Inactivated, Gogo/Airshare Boom Supersonic announced its demonstrator aircraft XB-1 successfully completed its third test fli>[...]