Northrop Grumman Sued In 2005 Chalks Ocean Airways Accident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-
10.14.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.15.25

Airborne-NextGen-10.16.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Wed, Jan 21, 2009

Northrop Grumman Sued In 2005 Chalks Ocean Airways Accident

Defunct Airline Blames Inadequate Design Of 58-Year-Old Airframe

The General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994, which limited tort claims against manufacturers of aircraft older than 18 years, allowed a renaissance among general aviation manufacturers. But there are still attorneys trying to find ways around it.

The Miami Herald reports Northrop Grumman faces two lawsuits over the December 2005 crash of a 58-year-old Grumman Turbo Mallard seaplane in passenger service with Chalk's Ocean Airways. Chalk's was the last operator using the type in commercial passenger service, and billed itself as the world's oldest airline, with a history of flying famous Hollywood stars and infamous Prohibition-era bootleggers to the Bahamas.

As ANN reported, the plane in question suffered a right-wing separation, burst into flames, and crashed into the ocean off Miami in view of crowds on the beach. The NTSB ruled the wing separated due to fatigue cracks, and blamed inadequate aircraft inspection by Chalk's, and lax maintenance oversight by the FAA.

Chalk's went out of business, and the FAA grounded the remaining Mallards and pulled Chalk's operating certificate.

Now, attorneys for Chalk's, its leasing companies, and AIG Insurance have filed two suits in federal court in Miami and New York, claiming the antique plane was "not adequately designed for its intended purpose."

John Eversole, at attorney for Chalk's says the NTSB was wrong to blame the airline.

"Our allegations are that there was a weak area where the wings are attached to the fuselage," he said "...This area is enclosed and cannot be inspected. The metal is built around the area where this wing sheared off... You can't inspect it, you can't perform maintenance on it. There is nothing you can do short of rebuilding the airplane."

AIG is trying to recover 50-million dollars it paid out in claims. Also named in both lawsuits is Frakes Aviation of Cleburne, TX... which is unlucky enough to be the current holder of the STC that allowed the retrofit of twin Pratt & Whitney Canada PT-6 turboprop engines, in the place of the Mallard's original radial motors.

AOPA Air Safety Foundation Executive Director Bruce Landsberg, commenting in his current blog, calls the case both amusing and infuriating.

"We agree that manufacturers need to be responsible for their products but is it only in aviation that companies can be held liable indefinitely?" Landsberg writes "It will be interesting to see if the legal system has the integrity to seriously question what I believe is an unjustified suit -- without running up a huge tab."

FMI: www.ntsb.gov, www.aopa.org/asf/

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 10.15.25: Phantom 3500 Confounds, Citation CJ3 Gen2 TC, True Blue Power

Also: Kodiak 100 Joins USFS, Innovative Solutions & Support Renamed, Gulfstream Selects Honeywell, Special Olympics Airlift The Phantom 3500 mockup made an appearance where the>[...]

Updated: Gryder Arrested On Gun Charge, Cites ‘Georgia Stand Your Ground’ Law

Incidents Allegedly Occured As Described in Police Report(s) 25-005809 and 25-005818 The name ’Dan Gryder’ is fairly well known to many in aviation.... Whether you like>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.18.25)

“Recent U.S. government policy updates emphasizing investment in domestic drone manufacturing align perfectly with our joint venture objectives, positioning us to meet critic>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.18.25): Final Approach Point

Final Approach Point The point, applicable only to a nonprecision approach with no depicted FAF (such as an on airport VOR), where the aircraft is established inbound on the final >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Eyeing the Hawk

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): The Best of the Eighties in the Early Twenties It can be argued with confidence that the father of the Ultralight aircraft from which the Light-Sport A>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC