FAA Says No To LAX's Request To Use Revenue For Jobs Program | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.03.24

Airborne-NextGen-06.04.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.05.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.06.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.07.24

Sat, May 20, 2006

FAA Says No To LAX's Request To Use Revenue For Jobs Program

Part Of Settlement With Neighbors Over Expansion

A proposed jobs program to attract residents affected by operations at Los Angeles International Airport cannot be supported by airport revenue funds, the FAA told officials at the busy airport this week.

The Los Angeles Times reports airport officials were told that since the airport receives funds from the FAA for improvement projects, LAX must comply with a law that says the airport cannot use its own revenues on anything other than activities related to airport operations -- and not matters of "general economic development, [or] marketing and promotional activities, that are unrelated to the airport."

Airport administrators told the Times they believe the jobs program is needed for airport development, because the program is part of a settlement reached last December between LAX and residents in surrounding neighborhoods. That settlement also put an end to the airport's 10-year, $150 million Master Plan for growth, in exchange for allowing the airport to expand its south runway.

The settlement also calls for the airport to support traffic and noise mitigation projects, streetscaping, and job training for neighborhoods and residents around the airport -- and that's the program now being questioned by the FAA.

Officials with LAX say they're not done arguing their case to the agency.

"We are looking at appealing the findings," said Los Angeles World Airports spokesperson Nancy Castles. "We're also looking at perhaps pursuing alternative funding options if necessary or redesigning the jobs program."

The FAA's move also struck City Councilman Tony Cardenas as odd. He is the former chair of the council committee that oversees the airport, and he also helped negotiate the benefits package in the settlement.

The FAA's "interpretation is unclear and does not allow us to give back to the families impacted by the airport," Cardenas said.

FMI: www.lawa.org, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.10.24): Known Traffic

Known Traffic With respect to ATC clearances, means aircraft whose altitude, position, and intentions are known to ATC.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.10.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Suppliers Association (ASA) Established February 25, 1993, the Aviation Suppliers Association (ASA), based in Washington, D.C., is a not-for-profit association,>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.11.24): Abeam

Abeam An aircraft is “abeam” a fix, point, or object when that fix, point, or object is approximately 90 degrees to the right or left of the aircraft track. Abeam indic>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.11.24)

Aero Linx: The Air Charter Safety Alliance The group, called the Air Charter Safety Alliance, will raise awareness of illegal charter flights among potential customers, charter bro>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.11.24)

“For months, ALPA has been sounding the alarm on the ongoing efforts by some aircraft manufacturers to remove pilots from the flight deck and replace them with automation. To>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC