NATA Responds To New Private Aircraft Security Rules | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.09.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Sep 12, 2007

NATA Responds To New Private Aircraft Security Rules

Concerned With Effect Of Proposed Rule On Small Operators

As ANN reported, on Tuesday the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency released proposed rules that, if enacted, will require private aircraft operators to submit passenger manifest data prior to any arrival in or departure from the United States.

The proposal will impose passenger and crew manifest requirements on all private aircraft. The requirements are nearly identical to the manifest rules for commercial operators.

"We expect that many of the more sophisticated private aircraft operators, such as larger businesses with an extensive flight department, would be able to adapt to the proposed requirements. However, we are quite concerned with the effect of this rule on the smallest of operators," explained National Air Transportation Association President James K. Coyne.

For instance, NATA notes, currently a flight returning to the US from Canada may make required arrival notifications to the CBP via a radio transmission while en route. This would no longer be permissible under the proposal just released.

The reason the rules now permit a radio transmission is because the aircraft may not be near a telephone. In fact, some aircraft flights may originate from locations without power, let alone a high-speed Internet connection that is necessary to submit the electronic manifest data.

"It appears that these unique operations were not given sufficient consideration in the development of the new requirement," Coyne said. "We will submit detailed comments to the CBP as to how such operations might be better accommodated in the regulations."

"We look forward to working with the CBP to craft final regulations that will not overly restrict the freedom of movement that private aircraft operators cherish," Coyne concluded.

FMI: www.nata.aero, www.dhs.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.08.25): Decision Altitude (DA)

Decision Altitude (DA) A specified altitude (mean sea level (MSL)) on an instrument approach procedure (ILS, GLS, vertically guided RNAV) at which the pilot must decide whether to >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.08.25)

Aero Linx: T-34 Association, Inc. The T-34 Association was formed in July 1975 so that individuals purchasing then military surplus T-34As had an organization which would provide s>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Piper PA-31T3

As He Released The Brakes To Begin Taxiing, The Brake Pedals Went To The Floor With No Braking Action Analysis: The pilot reported that during engine start up, he applied the brake>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.08.25)

“Legislation like the Mental Health in Aviation Act is still imperative to hold the FAA accountable for the changes they clearly acknowledge need to be made... We cannot wait>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 12.04.25: Ldg Fee Danger, Av Mental Health, PC-7 MKX

Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC