Pilot Forced to Surrender His Cessna 206 Over a Six Pack | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Wed, Apr 30, 2025

Pilot Forced to Surrender His Cessna 206 Over a Six Pack

Alaskan Man Seeks a Supreme Court Opinion in Decade-Old Case

Fairbanks pilot Kenneth Jouppi is being forced to forfeit his Cessna 206 Stationair after ‘knowingly’ using it to transport a six-pack to a dry village… 13 years ago. The case has been through the weeds since then and may now be on its way to the Supreme Court.

Jouppi’s case first began with a ruling from a Fairbanks jury over a decade ago. He, as the owner of KenAir LLC, was found guilty of a misdemeanor bootlegging charge after he assisted a passenger loading their cargo into the aircraft. These boxes and bags contained around 72 bottles of beer, however, and Alaska State Troopers were standing just off to the side with a warrant.

Though the court was unable to determine whether or not Jouppi was aware of what was inside the boxes, they were able to prove that he knew at least one six-pack was on board since it was visible through a plastic bag. Jouppi was slapped with three days in jail, a $1,500 fine for both him and KenAir, and three years of probation.

At the time, Jouppi’s Cessna 206 was still safe. District court trial judge Patrick Hammers clarified that the state’s law did not allow it to confiscate the aircraft. The Alaska Court of Appeals was quick to fight this decision, reversing the earlier court ruling and sending it back to the trial judge.

After several more court dates, a petition made its way to the Alaska Supreme Court to decide whether a $95,000 value forfeiture was excessive under constitutional law. Judges found that, "within this context, it is clear that the illegal importation of even a six-pack of beer causes grave societal harm. This factor strongly suggests that the forfeiture is not grossly disproportional."

So, after 13 years of court confusion, Alaska may still be able to take away Jouppi’s bird.

"In my opinion, if this isn't an excessive fine, I don't know what is," noted Robert John, Jouppi's attorney. "The odds are good that we're gonna be seeking review in the United States Supreme Court. So we gotta muster our resources and proceed forward."

FMI: https://courts.alaska.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 06.30.25: US v ADS-B Misuse, Nat’l STOL Fire, Volocopter Resumes

Also: Netherlands Donates 18 F16s, 2 737s Collide On Ramp, E-7 Wedgetail Cut, AgEagle's 100th In S Korea The Pilot and Aircraft Privacy Act was introduced in the House by Represent>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

Klyde Morris (06.30.25)

What Goes Around, May Yet Come Back Around, Klyde FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC