Uber Focus Of Airport-Related Class Action Suit | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.21.25

Airborne-NextGen-04.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.23.25

Airborne-FltTraining-04.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.25.25

Mon, Jan 18, 2016

Uber Focus Of Airport-Related Class Action Suit

Says Airport Fees Were Collected But Not Paid

If you used Uber to arrange airport transportation between June 1, 2010 to November 20, 2015, you may be eligible to participate in a class action suit against the company.

The suit, Vamsi Tadepalli v. Uber Technologies Inc., has been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, (Case No. 3:15-cv-04348-MEJ).

The suit alleges that Uber charged users of its app who arranged for transportation to or from a California airport fees that Uber allegedly represented were due to be paid to the airports but that were not remitted to the airports. The Action further alleges that Uber represented that it charged the fees to reimburse drivers for payment of the fees to the airport. The Action alleges that these fees were described as "Airport Fee Tolls" on receipts that riders received after the completion of a trip to or from a California airport for which such a fee was charged.

The settlement class is described as all persons who, from the dates mentioned above, used their Uber Accounts to arrange for transportation from a transportation provider to or from an airport in California and paid an Unremitted California Airport Fee Toll.

Uber denies Plaintiff's claims and contends that it and its related entities, including Rasier-CA, LLC, fully complied with the law. No court or other entity has made a judgment or other determination of any liability or wrongdoing by Uber or related entity.

FMI: Complaint

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.27.25)

“Our company is moving in the right direction as we start to see improved operational performance across our businesses from our ongoing focus on safety and quality. We conti>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.27.25)

Aero Linx: International Committee for Airspace Standards and Calibration (ICASC) The International Committee for Airspace Standards and Calibration (ICASC) was created following t>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Veteran's Airlift Command -- Serving Those Who Served

From 2013 (YouTube Edition): One Of Aviation's Most Positive Efforts... The VAC!!! In all the doddering, misleading, anti-aviation blather we've had to deal with over the last few >[...]

Airborne-NextGen 04.22.25: NYC eVTOL Network, ForgeStar-1, Drone Safety Day

Also: CiES Documents, Hypersonic Tech, SKYTRAC Health Monitoring, Skyryse Archer Aviation announced a blueprint for an eVTOL network in New York City that would connect travelers b>[...]

Airborne 04.21.25: Charter Bust, VeriJet Woes, Visual Approach Risks

Also: Sun Country CEO to Spirit, Indian AF Rafale Jets, Archer-United, Avflight Grows Federal prosecutors recently filed a lawsuit against an uncertified charter flight company and>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC