Residents Near AFB File Noise-Based Lawsuit | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.17.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-FltTraining-11.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.14.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Jan 28, 2016

Residents Near AFB File Noise-Based Lawsuit

Says Davis-Monthan AFB Is 'Too Loud' And Harming Their Health

A handful of residents living near Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona have filed a lawsuit in an effort to force the Air Force to conduct a new environmental impact study on noise near the base.

The Air Force Times reports that the plaintiffs, Ornelas, Gary Hunter and Anita Scales, are seeking to have the AF reissue the EIS because the assessment was "not adequately performed," according to the residents' attorney John Cardillo.

The suit stem from an Air Force decision in May of last year for a Total Force Training Mission which would increase the number of sorties from the base to include visiting units. The number of sorties would increase to 2,326 per year according to court documents. Cardillo said that some of the data used in the EIS released the same month as the approval of increased traffic understates the impact of that increase. She said Air Force "tried to minimize the impact."

The plaintiffs also allege that the Air Force did not comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) which requires a "detailed environmental statement before undertaking any 'major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.'"

In an email to the Air Force Times, a spokesman for the base said that "Davis-Monthan Air Force Base fully complied with all applicable laws when conducting its Total Force Training Environmental Assessment."

The Air Force has 60 days to respond to the complaint.

The court documents say that the plaintiffs are seeing "an award of costs and attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act.”

FMI: www.azd.uscourts.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.16.25): NonApproach Control Tower

NonApproach Control Tower Authorizes aircraft to land or takeoff at the airport controlled by the tower or to transit the Class D airspace. The primary function of a nonapproach co>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.16.25)

“This shutdown inflicted real damage. Beyond disrupting operations and adding risk into the aviation system… it hindered essential career growth opportunities and stal>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.16.25)

Aero Linx: The Mooney Mite Site Dedicated to the Mooney M-18 Mite, "The Most Personal Airplane," and to supporting Mite owners everywhere. The Mooney M-18 Mite is a single-place, l>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Vans Aircraft Inc RV-12

Pilot’s Improper Installation Of The Control Stick Pushrod Assemblies, Which Resulted In Separation Of The Left Pushrod And A Total Loss Of Roll Control Analysis: While retur>[...]

ANN FAQ: How Do I Become A News Spy?

We're Everywhere... Thanks To You! Even with the vast resources and incredibly far-reaching scope of the Aero-News Network, every now and then a story that should be reported on sl>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC