Residents Near AFB File Noise-Based Lawsuit | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.24.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.18.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.19.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Jan 28, 2016

Residents Near AFB File Noise-Based Lawsuit

Says Davis-Monthan AFB Is 'Too Loud' And Harming Their Health

A handful of residents living near Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona have filed a lawsuit in an effort to force the Air Force to conduct a new environmental impact study on noise near the base.

The Air Force Times reports that the plaintiffs, Ornelas, Gary Hunter and Anita Scales, are seeking to have the AF reissue the EIS because the assessment was "not adequately performed," according to the residents' attorney John Cardillo.

The suit stem from an Air Force decision in May of last year for a Total Force Training Mission which would increase the number of sorties from the base to include visiting units. The number of sorties would increase to 2,326 per year according to court documents. Cardillo said that some of the data used in the EIS released the same month as the approval of increased traffic understates the impact of that increase. She said Air Force "tried to minimize the impact."

The plaintiffs also allege that the Air Force did not comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) which requires a "detailed environmental statement before undertaking any 'major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.'"

In an email to the Air Force Times, a spokesman for the base said that "Davis-Monthan Air Force Base fully complied with all applicable laws when conducting its Total Force Training Environmental Assessment."

The Air Force has 60 days to respond to the complaint.

The court documents say that the plaintiffs are seeing "an award of costs and attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act.”

FMI: www.azd.uscourts.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 11.24.25: ANN's 30th!, Starship’s V3 Booster Boom, Earhart Records

Also: 1st-Ever Space Crime Was a Fraud, IAE Buys Diamonds, Kennon Bows Out, Perseverance Rover An interesting moment came about this past Sunday as ANN CEO, Jim Campbell, noted tha>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: DeltaHawk Aero Engine Defies Convention

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Deviation from the Historical Mean Racine, Wisconsin-based DeltaHawk is a privately-held manufacturer of reciprocating engines for aircraft and hybrid >[...]

NTSB Final Report: Glasair GlaStar

Smoke Began Entering The Cockpit During The Landing Flare, And Then The Pilot Noticed Flames On The Right Side Of The Airplane Analysis: The pilot reported that about 30 minutes in>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.22.25): Remote Communications Outlet (RCO)

Remote Communications Outlet (RCO) An unmanned communications facility remotely controlled by air traffic personnel. RCOs serve FSSs. Remote Transmitter/Receivers (RTR) serve termi>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC