Residents Near AFB File Noise-Based Lawsuit | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.17.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-FltTraining-11.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.14.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Jan 28, 2016

Residents Near AFB File Noise-Based Lawsuit

Says Davis-Monthan AFB Is 'Too Loud' And Harming Their Health

A handful of residents living near Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona have filed a lawsuit in an effort to force the Air Force to conduct a new environmental impact study on noise near the base.

The Air Force Times reports that the plaintiffs, Ornelas, Gary Hunter and Anita Scales, are seeking to have the AF reissue the EIS because the assessment was "not adequately performed," according to the residents' attorney John Cardillo.

The suit stem from an Air Force decision in May of last year for a Total Force Training Mission which would increase the number of sorties from the base to include visiting units. The number of sorties would increase to 2,326 per year according to court documents. Cardillo said that some of the data used in the EIS released the same month as the approval of increased traffic understates the impact of that increase. She said Air Force "tried to minimize the impact."

The plaintiffs also allege that the Air Force did not comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) which requires a "detailed environmental statement before undertaking any 'major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.'"

In an email to the Air Force Times, a spokesman for the base said that "Davis-Monthan Air Force Base fully complied with all applicable laws when conducting its Total Force Training Environmental Assessment."

The Air Force has 60 days to respond to the complaint.

The court documents say that the plaintiffs are seeing "an award of costs and attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act.”

FMI: www.azd.uscourts.gov

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Extra Aircraft Announces the Extra 330SX

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): An Even Faster Rolling Extra! Jim Campbell joined General Manager of Extra Aircraft Duncan Koerbel at AirVenture 2023 to talk about what’s up and>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.15.25)

“Receiving our Permit to Fly and starting Phase 4 marks a defining moment for Vertical Aerospace. Our team has spent months verifying every core system under close regulatory>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.15.25): Middle Marker

Middle Marker A marker beacon that defines a point along the glideslope of an ILS normally located at or near the point of decision height (ILS Category I). It is keyed to transmit>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Lancair 320

The Experienced Pilot Chose To Operate In Instrument Meteorological Conditions Without An Instrument Flight Rules Clearance Analysis: The airplane was operated on a personal cross->[...]

Airborne 11.14.25: Last DC-8 Retires, Boeing Recovery, Teeny Trig TXP

Also: ATI Strike Prep, Spirit Still Troubled, New CubCrafters Dealership, A-29 Super Tucano Samaritan’s Purse is officially moving its historic Douglas DC-8 cargo jet into re>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC