Residents Near AFB File Noise-Based Lawsuit | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-SpecialEpisode-12.15.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.16.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.12.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Jan 28, 2016

Residents Near AFB File Noise-Based Lawsuit

Says Davis-Monthan AFB Is 'Too Loud' And Harming Their Health

A handful of residents living near Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona have filed a lawsuit in an effort to force the Air Force to conduct a new environmental impact study on noise near the base.

The Air Force Times reports that the plaintiffs, Ornelas, Gary Hunter and Anita Scales, are seeking to have the AF reissue the EIS because the assessment was "not adequately performed," according to the residents' attorney John Cardillo.

The suit stem from an Air Force decision in May of last year for a Total Force Training Mission which would increase the number of sorties from the base to include visiting units. The number of sorties would increase to 2,326 per year according to court documents. Cardillo said that some of the data used in the EIS released the same month as the approval of increased traffic understates the impact of that increase. She said Air Force "tried to minimize the impact."

The plaintiffs also allege that the Air Force did not comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) which requires a "detailed environmental statement before undertaking any 'major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.'"

In an email to the Air Force Times, a spokesman for the base said that "Davis-Monthan Air Force Base fully complied with all applicable laws when conducting its Total Force Training Environmental Assessment."

The Air Force has 60 days to respond to the complaint.

The court documents say that the plaintiffs are seeing "an award of costs and attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act.”

FMI: www.azd.uscourts.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.19.25): Ultrahigh Frequency (UHF)

Ultrahigh Frequency (UHF) The frequency band between 300 and 3,000 MHz. The bank of radio frequencies used for military air/ground voice communications. In some instances this may >[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cirrus Design Corp SR22T

During The 7 Second Descent, There Was Another TAWS Alert At Which Time The Engine Remained At Full Power On October 24, 2025 at 2115 mountain daylight time, a Cirrus SR22T, N740TS>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Red Tail Project--Carrying the Torch of the Tuskegee Airmen

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Educational Organization Aims to Inspire by Sharing Tuskegee Story Founding leader Don Hinz summarized the Red Tail Project’s mission in simple, >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.19.25)

“This feels like an important step since space travel for people with disabilities is still in its very early days... I’m so thankful and hope it inspires a change in m>[...]

Airborne 12.17.25: Skydiver Hooks Tail, Cooper Rotax Mount, NTSB v NDAA

Also: New Katanas, Kern County FD Training, IndiGo’s Botched Roster, MGen. Leavitt Named ERAU Dean The Australian Transportation Safety Bureau (ATSB) has wrapped up its inves>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC