Sikorsky: Off-Balance Black Hawk Tail Rotor Would Be A 'Minor' Issue | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.13.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.14.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.15.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.16.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.17.24

Mon, Jan 09, 2017

Sikorsky: Off-Balance Black Hawk Tail Rotor Would Be A 'Minor' Issue

Company Responds To Army Report Stemming From 2015 Accident

In its investigation of an accident involving a UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter in November, 2015, the U.S. Army reported that the aircraft was "not airworthy" from November 10 until the accident occurred on November 15 because "the tail rotor had been out of balance (greater than 0.7 inches per second)"

But Sikorsky, which manufactures the helicopter, has a different view. The Killeen Daily Herald reports that the company contends that an off-balance tail rotor is "a very minor discrepancy that would not have an impact on the flight characteristics of the aircraft."

Four soldiers from Fort Hood were fatally injured when the helicopter went down.

The U.S. Army report also states that the aircraft did not experience a mechanical failure, and a visual inspection of the helo after the accident "revealed no pre-existing defects or anomalies that would have contributed to this accident.”

Sikorsky spokesman Paul Jackson said that the company was not part of the investigation and has no knowledge of the Army's report. He said he was providing the information about the tail rotor for informational purposes only.

Jackson said that his experts also contend that an unbalanced tail rotor would not cause a flight path stabilization warning to activate. “If there is a failure in the Flight Path Stabilization (FPS) System, the Master Caution and FPS caution/warning lights would illuminate, but there is no audible warning,” he said. “We cannot comment on any impact the warning lights may have had on the pilot flying the aircraft.”

Jackson said that the UH-60 can be manually flown without an operational FPS system.

The First Army Division West released a separate report in September that listed pilot error as the cause of the accident. The Army report in December redacted that information.

(Image from file)

FMI: www.army.mil, www.sikorsky.com

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Remembering Bob Hoover

From 2023 (YouTube Version): Legacy of a Titan Robert (Bob) Anderson Hoover was a fighter pilot, test pilot, flight instructor, and air show superstar. More so, Bob Hoover was an i>[...]

ANN FAQ: Follow Us On Instagram!

Get The Latest in Aviation News NOW on Instagram Are you on Instagram yet? It's been around for a few years, quietly picking up traction mostly thanks to everybody's new obsession >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.15.24)

Aero Linx: B-52H Stratofortress The B-52H Stratofortress is a long-range, heavy bomber that can perform a variety of missions. The bomber is capable of flying at high subsonic spee>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.15.24):Altimeter Setting

Altimeter Setting The barometric pressure reading used to adjust a pressure altimeter for variations in existing atmospheric pressure or to the standard altimeter setting (29.92).>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.16.24)

"Knowing that we play an active part in bettering people's lives is extremely rewarding. My team and I are very thankful for the opportunity to be here and to help in any way we ca>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC