Alaska Pilots May Soon Face Additional Fees And Taxes | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.03.24

Airborne-NextGen-06.04.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.05.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.06.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.07.24

Wed, Nov 08, 2017

Alaska Pilots May Soon Face Additional Fees And Taxes

Governor Bill Walker (I) Has Proposed Both

Airplanes are a vital mode of transportation in Alaska. According to the Alaska Ninety-Nines, there are six times as many pilots per capita, and 16 times as many airplanes per capita, when compared to the rest of the U.S. And Governor Bill Walker (I) wants to make it more expensive to fly there.

The blog Must Read Alaska reports that Gov. Walker has proposed a state airplane registration system that would be used to create a database for instituting an airplane tax. The tax would be $150 on any private plane, single engine, twin, reciprocating or turboprop, and $250 on any commercial aircraft of any size. The Walker administration has openly called the tax a user fee.

The airplane tax would bring in between $1.3 and $1.5 million each year, according to the blog. The state is also considering a motor fuel tax that would relieve Alaskans and others operating a motor vehicle in the state of $80 million per year, and that would include an increase in aviation fuel taxes.

Money raised through the aviation fuel tax would go into the general fund and not be reserved for aviation purposes.

Interestingly, according to the blog, there are no enforcement mechanisms or penalties associated with the registration fee. The state thinks aircraft owners will line up to pay on the honor system, but there is no repercussion for simply not registering your airplane.

Commercial airlines that are based out of state will be exempt from the registration "requirement", but in-state airlines would be required to pay the tax.

The Alaska DOT says that the tax is necessary because aircraft owners should pay for their use of the aviation system in the state, and commercial interests should pay more because they use more of the services. GA and recreational pilots do not place as much of a burden on the system, according to the agency.

The proposed tax is currently open for public comment.

(Image from file)

FMI: Original Report

Advertisement

More News

Archer Gains Part 135 Air Carrier & Operator Certificate

With Certification In-Hand, the Story Continues Archer has been given some very good news as of late, now having been granted their operator certificate from the FAA. Even better f>[...]

Airborne 06.10.24: Gone West-Bill Anders, M700 FIKI, TFR Corrections

Also: Virgin Galactic, TBMOPA’s European Convention, B-29 Doc and B-25 Berlin Express, Fairchild XNQ-1 An astronaut who was part of what was then mankind's greatest adventure>[...]

Airborne 06.10.24: Gone West-Bill Anders, M700 FIKI, TFR Corrections

Also: Virgin Galactic, TBMOPA’s European Convention, B-29 Doc and B-25 Berlin Express, Fairchild XNQ-1 An astronaut who was part of what was then mankind's greatest adventure>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.11.24)

“For months, ALPA has been sounding the alarm on the ongoing efforts by some aircraft manufacturers to remove pilots from the flight deck and replace them with automation. To>[...]

FlightHorizon Chosen for Osage Nation's Skyway36 Droneport

Skyway Range Begins Planning for Traffic Early On Skyway 36 is shaping up to be a handy UAV development location, boasting a 3,000-foot runway a short hop from downtown Tulsa, Okla>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC