Settlement Reported Near In 2010 Palo Alto Crash | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.05.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Wed, Jan 04, 2012

Settlement Reported Near In 2010 Palo Alto Crash

Pilot Departed In Fog, Result Was Damaged Homes, Three Fatalities

On February 17, 2010, a Cessna 310 (similar aircraft pictured) carrying three employees of Tesla Motors struck an electrical transmission tower shortly after takeoff from Palo Alto Airport in California. The wreckage skidded down a residential street, and while there were no injuries reported on the ground, debris struck several homes, setting three on fire.

Now, the San Jose Mercury News reports that an attorney for 51-year-old Lisa Jones, whose home was hit by a severed wing from the plane, has reached a financial settlement with Tesla Motors, the estate of the pilot, and several insurance companies. The home, which also housed a daycare center operated by Jones, suffered an estimated $200,000 damage, and has been uninhabitable for almost two years since the accident.

Jones first heard of the pending settlement announcement from a reporter. She tells the Mercury News, "I'm speechless. I feel there's something that's finally been done on my behalf."

The pilot of the Cessna 310, 56-year-old David Bourn, was a senior electrical engineer at Tesla Motors. Investigators say fog was so thick at the time of the takeoff that Bourn was warned by a controller who could not see his own runway. About 30 seconds after the initial warning, the controller repeated, "I cannot clear you for takeoff because I don't have visibility on the runway, so the release is all yours, and it's at your own risk, sir."

The NTSB's final report, published November 22, 2011, found pilot error the cause of the accident, but the board's report would not have been admissible in a civil liability trial. The terms of the forthcoming settlement have not been revealed.

FMI: http://dms.ntsb.gov/aviation/AccidentReports/uednk1551xxkpy45kkmpdh551/Y01032012120000.pdf

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.05.25): Circle To Runway (Runway Number)

Circle To Runway (Runway Number) Used by ATC to inform the pilot that he/she must circle to land because the runway in use is other than the runway aligned with the instrument appr>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.05.25)

Aero Linx: National Aviation Safety Foundation (NASF) The National Aviation Safety Foundation is a support group whose objective is to enhance aviation safety through educational p>[...]

NTSB Prelim: De Havilland DHC-1

At Altitude Of About 250-300 Ft Agl, The Airplane Experienced A Total Loss Of Engine Power On November 6, 2024, at 1600 central standard time, a De Havilland DHC-1, N420TD, was inv>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Boeing Dreamliner -- Historic First Flight Coverage

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Three Hour Flight Was 'Flawless' -- At Least, Until Mother Nature Intervened For anyone who loves the aviation business, this was a VERY good day. Afte>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.06.25: AF Uncrewed Fighters, Drones v Planes, Joby Crew Test

Also: AMA Names Tyler Dobbs, More Falcon 9 Ops, Firefly Launch Unsuccessful, Autonomous F-16s The Air Force has begun ground testing a future uncrewed jet design in a milestone tow>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC