Disappointing: NASA Delays Man’s Return to the Moon to At Least 2027 | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.19.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.21.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.23.25

Mon, Dec 09, 2024

Disappointing: NASA Delays Man’s Return to the Moon to At Least 2027

Artemis Mission Stalled to Allow Further Testing on Orion Capsule

NASA has delayed the Artemis II and Artemis III missions, which were expected to return astronauts to the moon for the first time since 1972, until 2026 and 2027. The decision was made to allow engineers to continue testing on the Orion crew capsule.

The last manned mission to the moon was NASA’s Apollo 17, which took place on December 19, 1972. This was the 9th and final Apollo crewed moon exploration mission.

The agency’s Artemis II mission aims to send astronauts on a 10-day trip to circumnavigate, but not land on, the moon. Artemis III will follow, marking astronaut’s return to the moon’s surface in over 50 years.

The two expeditions were originally planned for November 2024 and November 2025, but were pushed back to September 2025 and September 2026 in January. NASA explained that this was because of concerns with the batteries, air ventilation, and temperature controls on the Orion spacecraft. The program has also been generally controversial due to its relatively high costs and ambition.

The timing of these missions was questioned again after Artemis I returned with damage to the heat shield. Artemis I was a two-day uncrewed expedition from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in November 2022. During the spacecraft’s reentry, its heat shield “experienced an unexpected loss of charred material,” NASA explained.

Since then, agency engineers and another independent team have spent months conducting tests to determine the cause of the heat shield’s excessive wear. The investigation found that the heat shield would have been capable of keeping a crew safe, but that there should be “changes to Orion’s trajectory as it enters Earth’s atmosphere and slows from nearly 25,000 mph to about 325 mph before its parachutes unfurl for safe splashdown in the Pacific Ocean.”

“The Artemis campaign is the most daring, technically challenging, collaborative, international endeavor humanity has ever set out to do,” expressed NASA Administrator Bill Nelson. "We need to get this next test flight right. That’s how the Artemis campaign succeeds.”

FMI: www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Oshkosh Memories: An Aero-News Stringer Perspective

From 2021: The Inside Skinny On What Being An ANN Oshkosh Stringer Is All About By ANN Senior Stringer Extraordinare, Gene Yarbrough The annual gathering at Oshkosh is a right of p>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA32RT

Video Showed That During The Takeoff, The Nose Baggage Door Was Open On May 10, 2025, about 0935 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-32RT-300, N30689, was destroyed when it was invol>[...]

ANN FAQ: Follow Us On Instagram!

Get The Latest in Aviation News NOW on Instagram Are you on Instagram yet? It's been around for a few years, quietly picking up traction mostly thanks to everybody's new obsession >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.28.25)

"I think what is key, we have offered a bonus to air traffic controllers who are eligible to retire. We are going to pay them a 20% bonus on their salary to stay longer. Don't reti>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.28.25): Pilot Briefing

Aero Linx: Pilot Briefing The gathering, translation, interpretation, and summarization of weather and aeronautical information into a form usable by the pilot or flight supervisor>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC