Sun, Dec 20, 2009
Focus Is On Untrained Workers And Infrequent Inspections
TWU members visited Congressional offices this week asking for
tougher regulations over out-of-country repair stations operating
under FAA approval. The union also handed out "simulated
boarding passes" filled with maintenance-related questions to
people leaving Congressional office buildings.
TWU claims that hundreds of offshore facilities have minimal
oversight by the FAA. They cite issues such as foreign
maintenance workers that never receive the proper training and
aren't subjected to the same random drug, alcohol and background
checks as maintenance technicians in the US.
The FAA has approved 698 maintenance facilities outside the US .
Nine major air carriers reviewed by the FAA's Inspector General
(IG) sent 71 percent of their heavy airframe maintenance checks to
outside repair stations in 2007, up from 34 percent in 2003.
Foreign repair stations received 19 percent of these major
maintenance jobs in 2007. The work includes C and D checks.
"Offshore maintenance is the airline industry's dirty little
secret," said TWU International President James C. Little. "Our
union is going to tell the public that offshoring means your plane
has a lower standard for maintenance, it means the licensure and
security standard for the mechanics and their helpers who worked on
that aircraft is questionable and it means that federal regulators
had limited access to facilities where the plane was repaired."
TWU cites security risks in offshore maintenance facilities that
have been documented in a 2003 US DOT IG report and through
Congressional testimony. The IG report includes the following
findings:
- FAA still does not have comprehensive data on how much and
where outsourced maintenance is performed.
- There is no standard for all FAA offices regarding initial
inspector visits, which can cause safety issues to go
unchecked.
- Problems existed, such as untrained mechanics, lack of required
tools and unsafe storage of aircraft parts.
In a recent NPR story on international aviation maintenance,
former NTSB member John Goglia said "These findings are very, very
disturbing. We don't know what's going on in those facilities. If
we're not monitoring them properly, how do we know it's safe?"
More News
NonApproach Control Tower Authorizes aircraft to land or takeoff at the airport controlled by the tower or to transit the Class D airspace. The primary function of a nonapproach co>[...]
“This shutdown inflicted real damage. Beyond disrupting operations and adding risk into the aviation system… it hindered essential career growth opportunities and stal>[...]
Aero Linx: The Mooney Mite Site Dedicated to the Mooney M-18 Mite, "The Most Personal Airplane," and to supporting Mite owners everywhere. The Mooney M-18 Mite is a single-place, l>[...]
Pilot’s Improper Installation Of The Control Stick Pushrod Assemblies, Which Resulted In Separation Of The Left Pushrod And A Total Loss Of Roll Control Analysis: While retur>[...]
We're Everywhere... Thanks To You! Even with the vast resources and incredibly far-reaching scope of the Aero-News Network, every now and then a story that should be reported on sl>[...]