Uncle Sam Recovers $2 Million In Brown Field Accident That Totaled MV-22 | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.15.24

Airborne-NextGen-07.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-07.10.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-07.12.24

Sat, Apr 20, 2024

Uncle Sam Recovers $2 Million In Brown Field Accident That Totaled MV-22

U.S. Solicitor Settles for $2.02 Million in SDM Ground Collision

The United States has successfully settled for $2,020,000 in damages from various parties following an aircraft collision that occurred on May 30, 2020, at Brown Field Municipal Airport in San Diego.

This legal resolution marks the end of a significant legal battle that started in 2023, involving the U.S. Department of the Navy, which claimed extensive damages due to negligence and breach of restrictive covenants.

The incident involved two aircraft: a parked MV-22 Osprey, owned by the United States Marine Corps, and a taxiing De Havilland DHC-6-100 Twin Otter, owned by Kapowsin Air Sports but leased and operated by Tac Air Ops, LLC, and Tac Air California, Inc. The collision led to the Osprey being permanently removed from service, representing a substantial loss not only in terms of equipment but also operational readiness for the Navy.

The lawsuit named multiple defendants, including Christopher Sanders, the City of San Diego, and several aviation companies like Brown Field Aviation Ventures, Inc., and Lancair Corporation. These entities were accused of various negligent acts that contributed to the accident, from oversight failures to inadequate safety measures at the municipal airport.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Mary Cile Glover-Rogers managed the case, culminating in a settlement agreement reached on April 15, 2024, which preemptively dismissed the case with prejudice, preventing any further legal actions on this matter. U.S. Attorney Tara McGrath noted the settlement as an essential step towards acknowledging and rectifying the errors that led to this regrettable incident. McGrath emphasized that resolving the case swiftly was paramount to uphold the interests of the Navy and maintain the integrity of its operations.

This settlement reportedly does not only cover financial reparations but also sets a precedent for handling similar incidents involving military assets and civilian enterprises, reinforcing the need for rigorous adherence to aviation safety standards and regulatory compliance.

FMI: justice.gov

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: The Ultimate 'Solo' Trip -- Cameron Balloons' Sky Hopper

From 2011 (YouTube Version): A Unique, Affordable and Isolated way to Enjoy Ballooning Ballooning is both a unique as well as eclectic pursuit... and it attracts (naturally) a pret>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (07.14.24)

"Aviation in Alaska is essential to the transportation infrastructure. Many of our Alaskan customers rely on our products to access their homes, their communities, and run their bu>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.14.24): Approach Speed

Approach Speed The recommended speed contained in aircraft manuals used by pilots when making an approach to landing. This speed will vary for different segments of an approach as >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.14.24)

Aero Linx: Japan Business Aviation Association (JBAA) The Japan Business Aircraft Association (JBAA) was established in May 1996 as an incorporated nonprofit organization (in April>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.15.24): Apron

Apron A defined area on an airport or heliport intended to accommodate aircraft for purposes of loading or unloading passengers or cargo, refueling, parking, or maintenance. With r>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC