NTSB Final Report: Quad City Challenger | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Wed, Feb 05, 2025

NTSB Final Report: Quad City Challenger

Pilot Stated He Had No Experience In The Airplane Make And Model, But That He Ferried Airplanes For A Living

Location: Kent, Washington Accident Number: WPR23LA086
Date & Time: January 7, 2023, 13:18 Local Registration: N528J
Aircraft: Quad City Challenger Aircraft Damage: Substantial
Defining Event: Loss of control in flight Injuries: 2 Serious
Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Positioning

Analysis: The pilot-rated passenger had just purchased the light sport airplane and hired the pilot to relocate airplane to his home airport. The passenger/owner reported that the pilot stated he had no experience in the airplane make and model, but that he ferried airplanes for a living and was confident with no hesitations. After conducting a preflight inspection, the pilot and passenger boarded the airplane and the passenger briefed the pilot on the use of the airplane’s flaperons. The passenger reported that the airplane “swerved right” about 20 ft above ground level after takeoff, and that the pilot continued the climb while adjusting the flaperons. The pilot reported that, shortly after takeoff, the airplane became “unresponsive” to left stick inputs and entered an uncontrolled turn to the right. The pilot was unable to recover, and the airplane descended and impacted the roof of a storage facility, resulting in substantial damage to the fuselage and both wings. 

The forward control stick aileron cables separated at the left aileron turnbuckle and right aileron cable near the forward pulley. The forward control stick aileron cable sections, including turnbuckles and forward pulleys, were removed for further examination. The flaperons were near the full-down position. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation.

The right aileron control cable and the turnbuckle barrel for the left aileron control cable both exhibited ductile overstress fractures from abnormal loading, likely associated with impact. Even if either of the fractures occurred before impact, the ailerons could have been controlled by cables attached to the aft control stick. 

The left pulley and support brackets showed multiple contact marks and scratches consistent with cable contact outside the normal pulley groove contact area, but no similar contact marks were observed on the right pulley. If the abnormal cable marks on the left pulley were the result of slack in the system before the fracture, similar marks would also be expected on the right pulley. The absence of abnormal cable contact marks on the right pulley suggests the marks on the left pulley assembly likely occurred due to impact rather than due to preexisting slack in the system. 

Information from the airplane manufacturer stated that pilots should not attempt to fly without a proper type checkout. Information on the use of the flaperon system indicated that, under certain flight conditions with the flaperons extended, control stick pressures would become “heavy,” and in some cases, “an increasingly steep dive will result.” 

The pilot reported no experience in the accident airplane make and model. It is likely that the pilot’s lack of familiarity with the airplane’s flight characteristics resulted in his loss of airplane control during flight. 

Probable Cause and Findings: The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be -- The pilot’s inflight loss of airplane control. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s decision to fly the airplane without receiving training in its operation and flight characteristics.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.30.25): Ground Stop (GS)

Ground Stop (GS) The GS is a process that requires aircraft that meet a specific criteria to remain on the ground. The criteria may be airport specific, airspace specific, or equip>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.30.25)

Aero Linx: Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) improves safety and public confidence in aviation, marine and rail transport thro>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.30.25)

“The Palo Alto stopover confirmed—yet again—that flight schools and aero-clubs are no longer just curious about electric training; they are ready to buy. In just >[...]

NTSB Final Report: ICON A5

Pilot’s Failure To Maintain Clearance From The Water While Flying At A Low Altitude Analysis: The flight of two airplanes was in cruise flight on a north heading about 50 ft >[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.26.25: PA18 Upgrades, ‘Delta Force’, Rhinebeck

Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC