Inadequate Planning Blamed In Wings Over Dallas Mid-Air Collision | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.09.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.10.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Fri, Dec 13, 2024

Inadequate Planning Blamed In Wings Over Dallas Mid-Air Collision

NTSB Cites Shortcomings In Prebriefing, Oversight, And Risk Control

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), in a media release on December 9, points to inadequate planning as the primary factor leading to the fatal mid-air collision of a Boeing B-17G bomber and a Bell P-63F fighter during the Wings Over Dallas air show in November 2022 at Dallas Executive Airport in Texas.

The pilot, copilot, flight engineer, and two scanners in the B-17G and the pilot of the P-63F were fatally injured and both airplanes were destroyed. Both aircraft were operated by the Commemorative Air Force (CAF).

The accident occurred as the eight airplanes in the performance were completing a repositioning turn that involved a 90-degree right turn followed by a 270-degree left turn. The P-63F was in a descending left turn when it struck the left wing of the B-17G from behind.

Using data analysis from a visibility simulation that modeled the aircraft flight paths, altitudes, and roll angles of the airplanes, NTSB investigators determined that the pilots had limited ability to see and avoid each other’s aircraft. This was attributed to the geometry of the flight paths, and obscuration of the pilots’ out-the-window views by aircraft structures.

The NTSB concluded that there was a lack of a prebriefed aircraft separation plan as well as administrative actions to address the predictable risks associated with the series of maneuvers planned for the performance.

Investigators turned up additional safety issues including the lack of a risk assessment plan, unclear communication orders, a lack of requirements for recurrent evaluation of air bosses, inadequate air show safety assessment and reporting issues within the CAF, and insufficient regulatory oversight.

The NTSB also concluded that the circumstances of the accident accentuate the inherent limitations of the see-and-avoid concept for collision avoidance, particularly in the rapidly-moving environment of an air show performance involving multiple dissimilar aircraft.

FMI:  https://www.ntsb.gov/

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Up Close And Personal - The Aeroshell Aerobatic Team at Oshkosh

From 2014 (YouTube Version): One Of The Airshow World's Pre-Eminent Formation Teams Chats About The State Of The Industry At EAA AirVenture 2014, ANN News Editor Tom Patton gets th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.13.25): Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN)

Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN) An ultra-high frequency electronic rho-theta air navigation aid which provides suitably equipped aircraft a continuous indication of bearing and dis>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.13.25)

Aero Linx: Doobert Hi, we're Chris & Rachael Roy, founders and owners of Doobert. Chris is a technology guy in his “day” job and used his experience to create Doobe>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Pitts S2

The Airplane Was Spinning In A Nose-Down Attitude Before It Impacted Terrain On June 20, 2025, at 0900 eastern daylight time, a Pitts Aerobatics S-2B, N79AV, was destroyed when it >[...]

Airborne 07.09.25: B-17 Sentimental Journey, Airport Scandal, NORAD Intercepts

Also: United Elite Sues, Newark ATC Transitions, Discovery Moves?, Textron @ KOSH The Commemorative Air Force Airbase Arizona is taking its “Flying Legends of Victory Tour&rd>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC