FAA Tweaks New ETOPS Ruling | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.01.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.19.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Sat, Feb 17, 2007

FAA Tweaks New ETOPS Ruling

Allows "Dual Maintenance" In Limited Circumstances

They aren't big changes... but the FAA has already tweaked its ruling on Extended Operations (ETOPS) regulations for Part 121 and Part 135 turbine transport aircraft, one month after the original rule was published.

The changes -- none of which are substantive, in the FAA's words -- correct the rule language applicable to dual maintenance and formatting of a Part 1 definition and section of Appendix G. Following publication of the final rule, it was brought to the attention of the FAA the original intent of the concept of "dual maintenance" in the final rule did not codify existing FAA ETOPS guidance, as published in the notice of proposed rulemaking.

The amendment clarifies that language.

"Dual maintenance" is a concept relating to repetition of maintenance errors on redundant systems -- i.e., when one mechanic performs the same error while repairing two or more systems on the same aircraft. An example of dual maintenance error is failing to install o-rings on engine oil or fuel components on multiple engines.

Establishing procedures to avoid dual maintenance can minimize the probability of such errors. The use of two or more mechanics reduces the risk of this type of error. Routine tasks on multiple similar elements, such as oil and fuel filter changes, should never be scheduled and assigned on the same maintenance visit.

However, the FAA states, in some cases such procedures may be unavoidable. For instance, a pilot's report of a discrepancy on an ETOPS significant system may require maintenance on one engine, while a scheduled maintenance event is performed on the other engine.

In such cases, the certificate holder must establish and follow procedures to mitigate the risk of human error, according to the FAA's new language.

ETOPS regulations allow aircraft, other than an all-cargo operation in an airplane with more than two engines, to operate on one engine in the event of emergency within a time threshold identified in part 121 or part 135. That time threshold is determined using an approved one-engine-inoperative cruise speed under standard atmospheric conditions in still air.

FMI: Read The Amendment (.pdf)

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.29.25): Waypoint

Waypoint A predetermined geographical position used for route/instrument approach definition, progress reports, published VFR routes, visual reporting points or points for transiti>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.29.25)

Aero Linx: Sentimental Journey to Cub Haven Sentimental Journey Flyin began in 1986 with a group of dedicated volunteers working to provide a sentimental return to Lock Haven, the >[...]

NTSB Prelim: Jabiru USA Sport Aircraft LLC J230-SP

The Pilot Would Often Fly Over Their House At A Low Altitude And That Family Members Would Go Outside To Wave On November 14, 2025, at 1708 eastern standard time, a Jabiru USA Spor>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Crafting The Future of eVTOL Infrastructure

From 2024 (YouTube Edition): Volatus Infrastructure Paves The Way The name “Volatus” seems to be everywhere these days, popping up in a series of partnerships and proje>[...]

Klyde Morris (11.28.25)

Fortnite Conquers All, Klyde FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC